amend
They feared the articles would make a too powerful central government. That would trace back to a Monarchy like Britiains.
To discuss trade issues and to consider changing the Articles of Confederation.
The American Articles of Confederation were ineffective primarily due to their lack of a strong central government, which left the national government unable to levy taxes, regulate trade, or enforce laws. This weakness led to financial instability and difficulties in addressing interstate disputes. Additionally, the requirement for unanimous consent to amend the Articles made it nearly impossible to adapt to changing circumstances. Ultimately, these limitations prompted the creation of the U.S. Constitution.
The Articles of Confederation failed as a form of government for America partly because they granted very few powers to the government, and on top of this they were very difficult to amend. Changing anything about the Articles would require a unanimous vote from all thirteen states.
The articles allowed slavery to continue, was not a reason for changing the articles of confederation in the mid-1780.
he thought that the articles of confederation were fine and were decently handled ^^ his view at first. then when he got to the constitutional convention, he saw the flaws/weaknesses in the articles and took on a more anti-fed view.
amend
the articles allowed slavery to continue.
They feared the articles would make a too powerful central government. That would trace back to a Monarchy like Britiains.
They change it to Constitutional Convention because Articles of Confederation was to weak.
To discuss trade issues and to consider changing the Articles of Confederation.
The American Articles of Confederation were ineffective primarily due to their lack of a strong central government, which left the national government unable to levy taxes, regulate trade, or enforce laws. This weakness led to financial instability and difficulties in addressing interstate disputes. Additionally, the requirement for unanimous consent to amend the Articles made it nearly impossible to adapt to changing circumstances. Ultimately, these limitations prompted the creation of the U.S. Constitution.
The Articles of Confederation failed as a form of government for America partly because they granted very few powers to the government, and on top of this they were very difficult to amend. Changing anything about the Articles would require a unanimous vote from all thirteen states.
The Articles of Confederation were ineffective due to their weak central government, which lacked the power to levy taxes, regulate trade, or enforce laws. This led to financial instability and an inability to address economic challenges, such as debt and inflation. Additionally, the requirement for unanimous consent to amend the Articles made it nearly impossible to adapt to changing circumstances. As a result, the Articles failed to provide a cohesive framework for governance, prompting the need for the U.S. Constitution.
Well, America wanted a weak central government and strong state governments, but that plan was not very effectice. So the plan was to revise the Articles of Confederation, but they ended up changing it completely ( pretty much started over) and called it the Constition.
The biggest weakness of the Articles of Confederation was its lack of a strong central government, which resulted in an inability to enforce laws or levy taxes. This led to financial instability and difficulties in addressing interstate disputes. Additionally, the requirement for unanimous consent to amend the Articles made it nearly impossible to adapt to the changing needs of the nation. Ultimately, these limitations hindered effective governance and contributed to the call for a stronger federal system.