answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was not a reason for changing the Articles of Confederation in the mid 1780?

The articles allowed slavery to continue, was not a reason for changing the articles of confederation in the mid-1780.


What was Roger Sherman's opinion on changing the articles of confederation?

he thought that the articles of confederation were fine and were decently handled ^^ his view at first. then when he got to the constitutional convention, he saw the flaws/weaknesses in the articles and took on a more anti-fed view.


What is Process of changing Articles of Confederation or constitution?

amend


What Was not a reason for changing the articles of confederation in the mid 1780s?

the articles allowed slavery to continue.


Why was Rhode Island Reluctant in changing the Articles of Confederation?

They feared the articles would make a too powerful central government. That would trace back to a Monarchy like Britiains.


What was the main reasons for changing the articles of confederation?

They change it to Constitutional Convention because Articles of Confederation was to weak.


Why did Alexander Hamilton propose a meeting of the delegates?

To discuss trade issues and to consider changing the Articles of Confederation.


Why were he American Articles of Confederation innefective?

The American Articles of Confederation were ineffective primarily due to their lack of a strong central government, which left the national government unable to levy taxes, regulate trade, or enforce laws. This weakness led to financial instability and difficulties in addressing interstate disputes. Additionally, the requirement for unanimous consent to amend the Articles made it nearly impossible to adapt to changing circumstances. Ultimately, these limitations prompted the creation of the U.S. Constitution.


The constitution had to be approved by who?

The Articles of Confederation failed as a form of government for America partly because they granted very few powers to the government, and on top of this they were very difficult to amend. Changing anything about the Articles would require a unanimous vote from all thirteen states.


Why were the American articles or confederation ineffective?

The Articles of Confederation were ineffective due to their weak central government, which lacked the power to levy taxes, regulate trade, or enforce laws. This led to financial instability and an inability to address economic challenges, such as debt and inflation. Additionally, the requirement for unanimous consent to amend the Articles made it nearly impossible to adapt to changing circumstances. As a result, the Articles failed to provide a cohesive framework for governance, prompting the need for the U.S. Constitution.


What is the main reason for the articles of confederation being revised?

Well, America wanted a weak central government and strong state governments, but that plan was not very effectice. So the plan was to revise the Articles of Confederation, but they ended up changing it completely ( pretty much started over) and called it the Constition.


What was the biggest weakness of he Articles of Confederation?

The biggest weakness of the Articles of Confederation was its lack of a strong central government, which resulted in an inability to enforce laws or levy taxes. This led to financial instability and difficulties in addressing interstate disputes. Additionally, the requirement for unanimous consent to amend the Articles made it nearly impossible to adapt to the changing needs of the nation. Ultimately, these limitations hindered effective governance and contributed to the call for a stronger federal system.