The Indian Removal Acts of the 1830s were primarily supported by the belief in Manifest Destiny, which held that American expansion was both justified and inevitable. Many settlers and politicians viewed Native American lands as essential for agriculture and economic growth, particularly in the South. Additionally, influential figures like President Andrew Jackson championed the removal policies, asserting that relocating Native Americans to the west would protect them from encroaching settlers and conflicts. This resulted in widespread support among settlers eager for new land and opportunities.
Andrew Jackson
yes people were against this act because you cool
President Andrew Jackson (1829-1837) pushed for and signed into law the removal act, he administrated the removal for all but the last year or two of the removal; Martin Van Buren (1837- 1841) finished the work.
Indian Removal Act
Oklahoma
It depends. Some tribes were supported.
Andrew Jackson
Yes, he supported Andrew Jackson
opened native American lands up for settlement
The French
None. That act was created to further the genocide of Natives.
settlers in the south who wanted land for cotton farming
yes people were against this act because you cool
President Andrew Jackson (1829-1837) pushed for and signed into law the removal act, he administrated the removal for all but the last year or two of the removal; Martin Van Buren (1837- 1841) finished the work.
Indian Removal Act
justification for the indian removal act
Many Americans supported Indian removal because they thought it would be good for them because they did not think the U.S would expand past the Mississippi River. Some thought that now the Indians could govern themselves and not be harassed.