Only verbs have tenses (in English), and the word usually is an adverb. It has no tense.
Describing how to do a process is usually in the present tense.
did
They're the same thing - the 'simple' is usually just missed out.Other forms of the past tense are:Past PerfectPast ContinuousPast Perfect Continuous
Usually, past tense ending will be "ed" added onto the word. Some examples are how the verbs "jump" and "laugh" turn to the past tense forms of "jumped" and "laughed". However, many exception to the rule allow for words like "swim" to turn to the past tense form "swam" or "sing" to the past tense forms of "sang" or "sung".
No, have is the present tense. The past tense is had.
It is present tense.
Describing how to do a process is usually in the present tense.
To change a verb from present tense to past tense, usually you add "-ed" to the end of the verb. For example, "to have" in present tense becomes "had" in past tense.
No, it's a Past Tense or a (Past) Participle.
The past tense of "after" is "aftered," but it is not commonly used. Instead, the past tense is usually indicated by using the word "after" in combination with a verb in the past tense. For example: "He arrived after the party had ended."
Present Tense: I am alive. Past Tense: I was alive. Future Tense: I will be alive. "alive" is not a verb, it is an adjective, so the past/present/future tense is for the verb usually associated it.
No, the past tense of the verb to insert would be inserted. Usually the term comes up as a present tense imperative: insert coin here.
No. "Handwritten" might be used as a past tense, but it's usually used as an adjective.
Usually, when you see the -ed ending of a word, that means that it IS in past tense. The present tense of aided is to aid.
third person
did
Man-of-war is a noun, usually referring to a soldier. Since it is a noun and not a verb, it has no past tense.