answersLogoWhite

0

An Oligarchy = rule by the few.

Aristotle said that an Oligarchy was a degraded form of Aristocracy = rule by the best.

Sparta was a limited democracy - citizens in assembly voted on issues put before them but could not discuss or raise issues. Athens became a radical democracy where citizens in assembly raised, discussed and decided on issues.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What is plutocracy?

a government ruled by the wealthy


Could King Tutankhamun execute people?

Yes, like any Pharaoh. They were the most wealthy in the land and were top of the government.


Were all people in ancient Greece allowed to be in the government?

Yes and no. If you were a woman or slave you couldn't. Only free men could.


How many people lived in ancient greece-?

There is about 16,000 people that live in Ancient Greece. Greece has a little population.


What does tripartite government and checks and balances mean on the Roman Republic of Ancient Rome meant?

Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.

Related Questions

Are Greek people wealthy or poor?

Greece has both wealthy people and poor people. But many are middle class.


What is the system of government where a few wealthy people hold power over the larger group?

Oligarchy is government by the few. Plutocracy is government by the wealthy few.


Did the Mayans have a government?

The Mayan government was hierarchical in nature and headed by a King. Also high on the hierarchy were priests and other people who were educated and wealthy. Other people included the middle class that were able to rise to become "elites" and the commoners, who mainly consisted of farmers and laborers. Also considered commoners were slaves and servants.


Does Greece have limited or unlimited government?

limited. The people of Greece invented democracy


Type of government controlled by a few wealthy people?

An oligarchy is a government controlled by a small group of wealthy landowners and corporate leaders.


Who tended to divide rather than unify the people of ancient Greece?

The forms of government in ancient Greece tended to divide the people of Greece rather than unify them.


What describes a government in which only a small group of wealthy people have power?

oligarchy


What contributions did people have to make to the government in ancient Greece?

The senate


Which government tries to prevent the creation of really wealthy people and really poor people?

the chinese government and most other communistical countries


What government is it when all the laws and decisions are made ny a group of wealthy people?

capitalism


Who is the leader in Greece that encouraged the people of his city to participate in government?

Cleisthens


In the Roman Empire the wealthy citizens were called?

Wealthy people of Rome were called Patricians. American Government class? Me too. Tcarver6