IT was a hard because they did have a computer so they can learn how to twerk
The Boston Massacre was called the Boston Massacre, to be used as a tool of rhetoric. It was by no means a massacre, seeing as only five people were killed. It was a way for patriots like Paul Revere to uprise the spirits of the people and turn them against the British.
Paul Revere made and sold copies of Henry Pelham'sengravings of the Boston Massacre. Another engraver, Jonathan Mulliken, also made and sold prints of the event
1. The soldiers did not line up in a line. 2. It looks like the guy in the back gave them an order to fire, but he did not. 3. There was not as much blood as it looks like there was. I think there was a little bit more that was wrong without the engraving, but I'm not sure what.
A picture of the Boston massacre would have an angry mob of American colonists protesting against british soldiers. Some colonists would be dead due to the soldiers firing at the crowd.
all i know abou the Boston Massacre is that there were a group of like crazy people throwing rocks and making fun of the guards( that have like red shirts and black tall furry hats ) and then the guards started shooting at them .
The Boston Massacre was called the Boston Massacre, to be used as a tool of rhetoric. It was by no means a massacre, seeing as only five people were killed. It was a way for patriots like Paul Revere to uprise the spirits of the people and turn them against the British.
Paul Revere made and sold copies of Henry Pelham'sengravings of the Boston Massacre. Another engraver, Jonathan Mulliken, also made and sold prints of the event
No. The townshend acts were not responsible for the Boston massacre. the Boston massacre was just a deadly riot. then the townsend acts was just like the king housing the redcoats without paying. they relly had no interjection between them.
because of people like you and your pathetic english!
They didnt like them because they teased them about their red jackets saying that they looked like lobsters.
1. The soldiers did not line up in a line. 2. It looks like the guy in the back gave them an order to fire, but he did not. 3. There was not as much blood as it looks like there was. I think there was a little bit more that was wrong without the engraving, but I'm not sure what.
A picture of the Boston massacre would have an angry mob of American colonists protesting against british soldiers. Some colonists would be dead due to the soldiers firing at the crowd.
The military occupation of British soldiers in Boston as well as the several acts that the king declared, like the stamp act.
all i know abou the Boston Massacre is that there were a group of like crazy people throwing rocks and making fun of the guards( that have like red shirts and black tall furry hats ) and then the guards started shooting at them .
Samuel Adams convinced Paul Revere to make a picture of the Boston Massacre. It wasn't accurate, but Samuel Adams wanted to use what happened in the Boston Massacre to make Colonists even angrier with the British. The Boston Massacre shows how things can get out of hand, especially when bad feelings already exist between people
The Boston massacre allowed the Colonial leaders the opportunity to engage in warfare with the British soldiers. The Boston massacre occurred because the Colonists were protesting the recent Tea Tax. British soldiers fired into the crowd, killing four men.
innocent because they did a bad thing like dumping the tea in the ship