Economic statistics are a modern phenomenon. In historic times it was not the international consideration it is today. When countries had an absolute ruler and that ruler required fiscal support he or she "taxed" the people under him/her. Who, in turn, taxed those under them. There was no overall national economy, merely an ability to raise a certain amount for a specific purpose.
he was kind
Not much different to what it looked like before; although Hastings gives it name to the Battle, it was actually fought at Senlac Hill, 6 miles North-West of Hastings, near the modern-day town of Battle.
Yes the Normans did win the Battle of Hastings because of Harold Godwinson's mistakes for example he lost most of his men because he fought in a battle against Hardrada just before he heard that the Normans had landed in Dover and he only had about a quarter of his men left. Does that answer the question??!!
The Hopwood family is not prominently associated with the Battle of Hastings, which took place in 1066. The battle primarily involved figures like William the Conqueror and King Harold II. However, the name "Hopwood" may have later historical relevance in England, but there are no significant records linking them directly to this pivotal battle.
William the conqueror's strengths were his skill and ability in being ... smart. like in The Battle of Hastings, William pretended to run away from the battle but then he surrounded the opposition when they came for them and attacked. Very clever.
he was kind
Not much different to what it looked like before; although Hastings gives it name to the Battle, it was actually fought at Senlac Hill, 6 miles North-West of Hastings, near the modern-day town of Battle.
got 7 j's and ruled England like a true king.
Yes the Normans did win the Battle of Hastings because of Harold Godwinson's mistakes for example he lost most of his men because he fought in a battle against Hardrada just before he heard that the Normans had landed in Dover and he only had about a quarter of his men left. Does that answer the question??!!
William the conqueror's strengths were his skill and ability in being ... smart. like in The Battle of Hastings, William pretended to run away from the battle but then he surrounded the opposition when they came for them and attacked. Very clever.
duke William of Normandy.
Harold didn't have that much good luck. Although he won a battle against Harold Hardrada which meant him and his army had some experience on what it was like in a battle so it would be easier for him to kill William of Normandy in the battle of Hastings's. Thank-you
It was really dramatic and bloody but it was victory for the normans because william was shot in the eye with an arrow
they used alot of weponds like a catapult and axes spears and blood axes
The primary technology used in the Battle of Hastings was weaponry such as swords, spears, and arrows. Horses were also used for cavalry charges. However, there was no advanced technology like gunpowder or heavy artillery.
It happened after the Battle of Trenton!! i like that battle lol
Oh, dude, at the Battle of Hastings, William Godwinson had around 7,000 troops, but like, who's counting, right? I mean, it's not like they had a sign-in sheet at the battlefield. Just imagine a bunch of dudes in armor swinging swords and stuff. Good times, good times.