1. He didn't agree with Confucius, instead, he preferred Legalism. The legalists believed that people could force to be good. In this way, he built his empire stronger. However, this didn't really work. More and more people began to rebel the Qin king and it collapsed.
Ly Bi and Trieu Quang Phuc led revolts.
he did this by being the greatest leader he could be
One significant lack of achievement during Qin Shi Huangdi's rule was the establishment of a lasting political unity. While he unified China and standardized various systems, his autocratic rule led to widespread discontent and rebellion. The harsh legalist policies and heavy taxation created resentment among the populace, ultimately contributing to the Qin Dynasty's quick downfall shortly after his death. Additionally, cultural achievements were stifled due to the infamous book burnings and suppression of intellectual thought.
Shi Huangdi's leadership hurt the empire because he was putting all of the farmers to work on the new roads in China and build the Great Wall of China.
Because Shi Huangdi burned books, forced nobles to move away, and forced commoners to work on government projects. Therefore, historians must have thought that Shi Huangdi wasn't a great and fair ruler for doing that. If I am wrong, sorry. That's the best I can do, hope I helped.
Ly Bi and Trieu Quang Phuc led revolts.
u tell mehhh!!!!!!!!!!!
he did this by being the greatest leader he could be
Korea.
Legalism was one of them and the changing of currency
The Great Wall of China
g
One significant lack of achievement during Qin Shi Huangdi's rule was the establishment of a lasting political unity. While he unified China and standardized various systems, his autocratic rule led to widespread discontent and rebellion. The harsh legalist policies and heavy taxation created resentment among the populace, ultimately contributing to the Qin Dynasty's quick downfall shortly after his death. Additionally, cultural achievements were stifled due to the infamous book burnings and suppression of intellectual thought.
His government was stable and his rule was less harsh than Shi
Shi Huangdi's leadership hurt the empire because he was putting all of the farmers to work on the new roads in China and build the Great Wall of China.
Yes
Shi Huangdi's legal system, characterized by strict authoritarianism and harsh punishments, contrasts sharply with American justice, which emphasizes individual rights and due process. Under Shi Huangdi, laws were rigidly enforced, often with severe penalties for even minor offenses, whereas American justice promotes rehabilitation, fairness, and the presumption of innocence. Additionally, Shi Huangdi's laws lacked the checks and balances inherent in the American legal system, where judicial independence and the appeal process are fundamental principles.