theree similar because there cool
its not a good answer
maybe this will halp more...so
They are both Asian countries. They are both very strong economies, and export many commodities to the world.
China and Japan have almost the same written language. They also have similar forms of architecture
The feudal system was imposed on serfs (poor farmers) by Princes: the wealthy nobility.
William the Conqueror instituted the feudal system to govern with when he won the Battle of Hastings in 1066.
European feudalism was based instead on Roman Imperial laws and customs, supplemented with Germanic traditions, and supported by the authority of the Catholic Church. Japanese feudalism was based on the ideas of the Chinese philosopher Kong Qiu or Confucius (551-479 BCE). Confucius stressed morality and filial piety, or respect for elders and other superiors.
Developed a rigid class structure.
In the Japanese feudal system, the equivalent of a lord in the European feudal system was the daimyo. Daimyos were powerful landowners who held significant authority over their territories, similar to European lords. They governed their domains, maintained samurai warriors, and had vassals under their control, reflecting the hierarchical structure of feudal society in Japan.
Europe and Japan were both feudal societies. Feudal systems contain hierarchies. The hierarchies in Japan and Europe were similar: king/emperor on the top, nobles next, then knights/samurai, then merchants and craftsmen, and lastly, peasants and serfs.
hunting and gathering feudal industrial advanced industrial imperial societies
Taxes, Slaves, Tribute. Imperial Monopoly on Salt Mines.
The feudal system was imposed on serfs (poor farmers) by Princes: the wealthy nobility.
They both used the feudal system. The feudal system is a kind of culture in which the knights (in Japan, Samurai) owned most of the land and were responsible to the King (in Japan, Emperor), and basically ruled over the peasants.
The government form in China in the middle ages was Dynasties. They were NOT successful.
They both have a "cast" structure into which people are born.
Consolidation of feudal leaders and areas. Ruling the whole of Japan was best done by delegating Imperial rulings to local warlords. One obvious advantage was a standing national army made up of many smaller regional armies. Although local warlords could amass power, it still paled to the over all power of the emperor. kapm
1066-1500
In feudal Japan, the emperor held a largely symbolic and ceremonial role, serving as the spiritual leader and figurehead of the nation. While the emperor was regarded as the legitimate ruler, actual political power was often wielded by shoguns and samurai, who governed on behalf of the emperor. The emperor's authority was rooted in tradition and divine ancestry, but during the feudal period, he had limited influence over military and governmental affairs. This system created a distinct separation between the imperial family and the feudal lords who exercised real control over the country.
One key difference between feudal Europe and feudal Japan lies in their social hierarchies and roles within the class structure. In Europe, the feudal system was characterized by a rigid class structure with kings, nobles, knights, and peasants, while in Japan, the system was more focused on the samurai warrior class, who held significant power and loyalty to their daimyo (feudal lords). Additionally, the cultural and religious influences, such as the prominence of Christianity in Europe versus Shinto and Buddhism in Japan, shaped their respective societies and governance.
Developed a rigid class structure.