There were several disagreements in the convention. One of the major ones was that the small states were afraid that the larger states would have more power. This was solved through the VA plan where there would be two houses in the legislative branch. Then, there was the problem in counting slaves as part of the population for the House. It was decided that a slave counted as 3/4 of a person in the count. These are just two of the problems that cropped up.
Patrick Henry
Rhode Island was the only colony that did not take part in the Constitutional Convention. Some say that this was because it was not fully attached to the other thirteen colonies
If you are asking about the constitutional convention there was Franklin, Adams, Madison, Monroe, Jay, Jefferson, to name a few.
Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams.
In a sense.The Constitutional Convention, in itself, did not replace the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was created at the Convention and it was based upon some of the ideals that the Articles of Confederation had, but had changed many things.So, in a sense, no. The Constitutional Convention did notreplace the Articles of Confederation, but the Constitution that was created then did.
what did some delegates to the constitutional convention think a republic would do
because.
You thought you was gonna get the answer haha but you didn't
Patrick Henry
Rhode Island was the only colony that did not take part in the Constitutional Convention. Some say that this was because it was not fully attached to the other thirteen colonies
If you are asking about the constitutional convention there was Franklin, Adams, Madison, Monroe, Jay, Jefferson, to name a few.
William Samuel Johnson was allowed to join the constitutional convention because people respected him and he had influence on some of the other members. He was recommended by other friends to join.
Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams.
c
In a sense.The Constitutional Convention, in itself, did not replace the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was created at the Convention and it was based upon some of the ideals that the Articles of Confederation had, but had changed many things.So, in a sense, no. The Constitutional Convention did notreplace the Articles of Confederation, but the Constitution that was created then did.
The Constitutional convention was not actually called the constitutional convention because it was created to modify the Articles of Confederation. However, the articles, although they had some benefits, were very weak and gave most power to the states and not to the central gov't, so the constitution was drafted in secret, so as not to influence any of the framer's views by outside opinions.
Some source says 55 and Some source says 41.