They were not as mobile. The way they hunted was limited without the horse. For the plains Indians, who depended on the buffalo herds could not follow as well without horses. But the biggest difference was how they fought. A lot of the tribes were very peaceful but some were not. The tribes with horses had a huge advantage.
I think the Comanche had the horses first?
Nez Perce
No, because there were no horses before the Spanish settlers brought them from Spain.
were skilled too shoot under horses chin
The Sioux traveled by horses, obviously.
The most common Indian tribe known for using horses is the Sioux. Many think the Iroquois and Kwakiutl Indian groups also used horses.
"Indian" is not a recognized lifestyle and therefore we can not answer your question.
I think the Comanche had the horses first?
in india
"Indian" is not a recognized lifestyle and therefore we can not answer your question.
Horses made the Cheyenne more mobile when hunting and the horses were able to carry heavier loads of game.
Horses made the Cheyenne more mobile when hunting and the horses were able to carry heavier loads of game.
Horses made the Cheyenne more mobile when hunting and the horses were able to carry heavier loads of game.
== ==
Before they got horses they mostly ate corn because they were corn farmers. Once they got horses they gave up farming and mostly hunted bison,deer, and elk.
Before cars there were carriages pulled by horses. Before cars there were carriages pulled by horses. Before cars there were carriages pulled by horses.
they used horses