Travon looks like a burned tortiah on stailroids
tyler swift:)
The main agreements between the antifederalist and the federalist were about the bill of rights and the need for a government. The antifederalist demanded to have a bill of rights because it can explain the ideals described in the Declaration of Independence better than the Constitution because the bill of rights gives us freedom of press, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion. Also, the federalist felt like it was important to have a government. They both disagreed. This is right luv
Jefferson's main argument is that men are given certain rights by God. The British were stomping on those rights by unfair taxation.
The main body of the Constitution are the Amendments.
The writer employs a combination of examples and evidence to elaborate on the main argument. By integrating relevant data, anecdotes, or case studies, they provide concrete support that enhances the reader's understanding. Additionally, the use of logical reasoning helps to clarify the connections between the main argument and the supporting points. This multifaceted approach strengthens the overall persuasiveness of the argument.
tyler swift:)
they didn't get to practice the Bill of Rights
they didn't get to practice the Bill of Rights
The main argument that was made in favor of the Bill of Rights was that it would guard against the emergence of a tyrannical government. The anti-Federalists, in particular, fought to have the Bill of Rights included in the Constitution.
Federalists wanted to urge the Constitution to be in action, but the Anti-Federalists didn't want the Constitution to be in commencement. They were against it.
The main argument that was made in favor of the Bill of Rights was that it would guard against the emergence of a tyrannical government. The anti-Federalists, in particular, fought to have the Bill of Rights included in the Constitution.
The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.
The claim is the argument you plan to prove.
The adoption of the constitution in the United States pretty much guaranteed a war with England. This was the main argument against it.
The main agreements between the antifederalist and the federalist were about the bill of rights and the need for a government. The antifederalist demanded to have a bill of rights because it can explain the ideals described in the Declaration of Independence better than the Constitution because the bill of rights gives us freedom of press, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion. Also, the federalist felt like it was important to have a government. They both disagreed. This is right luv
(Apex) To establish the main points of the argument.
Theire main argument was that the Constitution binds the states much like England binded the states. In their eyes, why go back to be bound if they just fought a war to be free?