AnswerIn fact, the soldiers were not punished. They were held for trial, but patriot John Adams agreed to defend them, in order to ensure a fair trial (and not alienate moderates from the Patriot cause), and did so successfully.Two of the British soldiers were punished for manslaughter by having an "m" branded on their thumbs. This was considered a light punishment at that time, but was to ensure they could not escape harsher punishment for manslaughter in any subsequent trial.
This was part of the Intolerable Acts of 1774 and was based on the idea that British soldiers would not get a fair hearing in the colonies where the people were unfairly biased against the British soldiers. It was also a nod to the Boston Massacre trials in 1770 where colonists convicted two British soldiers of manslaughter and the perceived illegitimacy of this trial by British authorities.
There was not a winning and a losing side in the Boston Massacre. Five Colonials died, and the soldiers were tried in civil court. Two were found guilty of manslaughter. But it was not a win nor a defeat. It was just a moment in history.
The term British Soldiers applies to all soldier of the United Kingdom, and historically all soldiers of the British Empire.
The Boston Massacre is the incident in which five soldiers were shot by British soldiers in 1770.
Branded on the thumbs, then released.
AnswerIn fact, the soldiers were not punished. They were held for trial, but patriot John Adams agreed to defend them, in order to ensure a fair trial (and not alienate moderates from the Patriot cause), and did so successfully.Two of the British soldiers were punished for manslaughter by having an "m" branded on their thumbs. This was considered a light punishment at that time, but was to ensure they could not escape harsher punishment for manslaughter in any subsequent trial.
This was part of the Intolerable Acts of 1774 and was based on the idea that British soldiers would not get a fair hearing in the colonies where the people were unfairly biased against the British soldiers. It was also a nod to the Boston Massacre trials in 1770 where colonists convicted two British soldiers of manslaughter and the perceived illegitimacy of this trial by British authorities.
The Intolerable Acts , said that the colonists had to feed and house british soldiers , for their punishment for the Boston Tea Party.
The Intolerable Acts , said that the colonists had to feed and house british soldiers , for their punishment for the Boston Tea Party.
There was not a winning and a losing side in the Boston Massacre. Five Colonials died, and the soldiers were tried in civil court. Two were found guilty of manslaughter. But it was not a win nor a defeat. It was just a moment in history.
John Adams defended the British soldiers. Taking the case subjected him to much criticism, but he truly believed every person deserved an honest defense, so he took the case for a payment of eighteen guineas. Six of the eight soldiers were acquitted, and two were convicted of manslaughter and branded on their thumbs.
The term British Soldiers applies to all soldier of the United Kingdom, and historically all soldiers of the British Empire.
the Bostonians hated the british soldiers because they kept on tormenting them
They were very different from the British soldiers and wanted to declare independence from England.
The King of England (Don't know his name) was enraged at this act. In punishment, he raised taxes on the colonies and passed the intolerable act in which the people of the colonies were required to house British soldiers and other unfair punishments.
who commanded the American soldiers who captured 5,800 British soldiers under General Burgoyne at Saratoga