US: M1 Garand, M1911, M1903 Springfield, M1918(A1 / A2) BAR, M1 Carbine, MKII Grenade, M1919 MG, M2 HMG
North Korea & China (mainly): Various Mauser rifles, German Stick Grenades, Assorted Machineguns - too many to list
No nuclear weapons were used in the Korean War.....
Expansion of the war could have meant the use of atomic weapons.
Many people in the US wanted to use nuclear weapons, other wise...don't fight the war at all!
The Korean War 1950-1953 and the Vietnam War 1961-1973 are normally classified at LIMITED WARS because they were limited in the boundaries of where they could fight, and limited with the weapons they could use, such as NO ATOMIC WEAPONS!
It wasn't a president, it was a general. The president fired the general and refused to authorize use of nuclear weapons.
No nuclear weapons were used in the Korean War.....
The Korean War was the first LIMITED WAR fought in the ATOMIC AGE. Limited to the use of CONVENTIONAL Weapons only.
Nuclear weapons is a rare sight, and used to protect soldiers in war.
because the other soldiers at the other end had weapons and if neither of the side had weapons there would be no war [MAYBE A FIST FIGHT] but yeah.
a lot
big ones
Expansion of the war could have meant the use of atomic weapons.
Total war is all out war; including the use of atomic weapons. The Korean War and the Vietnam War were LIMITED WARs, "No Atomic Weapons."
No atomic bombs were used in the Korean War and there were never any plans to use them. Possibly the existence of atomic weapons had some small effect.
He did not use atomic weapons and fired General Douglas Mac Arthur.
They would use just about any weapons they could find. Normally, their weapons would not be up to date. Weapons would be in mass production though.
Many people in the US wanted to use nuclear weapons, other wise...don't fight the war at all!