A militia
a mitti
the Norman army had three types of soldier; spear men cavalry (horsemen) and archers
There were about 5,000 men in a Roman legion. It is difficult to give an exact number because the Romans had an annoying habit of not replacing men in a legion when they were either killed or retired. Another factor was the cavalry. Normally 120 horsemen were attached to each legion. (they were mostly used for communication and dispatch riders). However, if the legion were going to enter into combat, more cavalry would be recruited which would swell the numbers of a legion. So the best number anyone can give out is about 5,000 men.
A Corps is a body of men which is made up of 1 or more divisions. Army or Army Group is bigger, Division is smaller than a Corps. If you take D day as an example: Eisenhower is the Army commander. Bradley & Montgomery each command Army Groups, the people like Leese, Hodges & Patton are Corps Commanders.
volunteers
a mitti
the Norman army had three types of soldier; spear men cavalry (horsemen) and archers
They were most likely groups of 50.000 men with swords, spears, arrows, etc.
There were 4 groups of men who didn't have to go to war in the British Army. These were the sick men, the old men, the mentally challenged men, and the physically disabled men.
The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.The century was the smallest fighting group in the Roman army. The smaller groups into which a century was divided was called a contubernium. However this was not a fighting group. It was a tent group consisting of eight (and later ten) men who shared a tent on the march or a barrack room in a fort. They were not a unit as we think of a military unit today, and they didn't always share the same jobs.
There were about 5,000 men in a Roman legion. It is difficult to give an exact number because the Romans had an annoying habit of not replacing men in a legion when they were either killed or retired. Another factor was the cavalry. Normally 120 horsemen were attached to each legion. (they were mostly used for communication and dispatch riders). However, if the legion were going to enter into combat, more cavalry would be recruited which would swell the numbers of a legion. So the best number anyone can give out is about 5,000 men.
the British army (their men)
A Corps is a body of men which is made up of 1 or more divisions. Army or Army Group is bigger, Division is smaller than a Corps. If you take D day as an example: Eisenhower is the Army commander. Bradley & Montgomery each command Army Groups, the people like Leese, Hodges & Patton are Corps Commanders.
soilders infantry
volunteers
The communist group (Bolsheviks) made up the Red Army; the Non-communist group (the Tsar's men) made up the White Army.
Western-Men