A tyrant was appointed to give some equality in a city-state split by upper classes exploiting the lower classes. The tyrant's problem was that the aristocracy would set out to assassinate him in order to regain ascendancy and control. The tyrant would have to establish a large bodyguard, and to pay for them, collect a tax. All classes hated taxes, so the tyrant's support waned and would be expelled, with either the aristocrats taking over or a democracy was set up by the lower classes.
Rome had no tyrants. The tyrants were a Greek form of government.
the tyrants were able to seize power from the nobles because they had the help and support of the Greek farmers, merchants, and the artisans.
ending the rule of tyrants.
no
Kings, oligarchs, tyrants, democrats.
Greek tyrants were rules who seized power by force from the aristocrats.
Rome had no tyrants. The tyrants were a Greek form of government.
The tyrants took over
Powerhungry, tyrannous
the tyrants were able to seize power from the nobles because they had the help and support of the Greek farmers, merchants, and the artisans.
I think it was tyrants myceans
I think it was tyrants myceans
tyrants
tyrants
ending the rule of tyrants.
no
Solon and Draco