They smashed windows with small toffee hammers Would chain themselves out side of downing street Massive meetings in hyde park London on Sunday's They went on hungerstrike in prison Hope this helped :)
AIM used tactics that were often confrontational and violent.
The wspu supported violent tactics ......
None. Malcolm X threatened the use of violence (in self defense) to deter would-be aggression towards him.
I think that so long as it was non-violent, Dr. King would consider doing it, if it advanced his cause.
Civil rights movements can turn violent due to a variety of factors, including systemic oppression, frustration with slow progress, and reactions to violent repression from authorities. When peaceful protests are met with brutality, communities may feel compelled to resort to more aggressive tactics to draw attention to their cause and demand change. Additionally, internal divisions and external provocations can escalate tensions and lead to violence. Ultimately, the intersection of deep-seated grievances and immediate provocations can trigger violent outbreaks within civil rights struggles.
violent tratics of course
AIM used tactics that were often confrontational and violent.
Fasting in jail was one of Gandhi's major tactics in his non-violent revolution.
Non-violent Civil Disobedience
violent scare tactics
To defend themselves against violent criminals.
to abandon, violent, militant tactics in favor of civil disobedience
Nonviolent is the avoidance of violent actions.
NovaNet Answer: intellectual protest, economic boycotts, and violent intimidation.
The wspu supported violent tactics ......
ISIS stands for Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. It is a militant group known for its extremist ideology and violent tactics.
Yes, non-violent political tactics can be highly effective against governments and their actions. Strategies such as protests, civil disobedience, and grassroots organizing can mobilize public support, raise awareness, and pressure authorities to change policies. Historical examples, like the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S. and India's independence movement, demonstrate that non-violent resistance can lead to significant political and social change. Additionally, such tactics often garner greater legitimacy and moral authority, making it harder for governments to justify repression.