They smashed windows with small toffee hammers Would chain themselves out side of downing street Massive meetings in hyde park London on Sunday's They went on hungerstrike in prison Hope this helped :)
AIM used tactics that were often confrontational and violent.
The wspu supported violent tactics ......
None. Malcolm X threatened the use of violence (in self defense) to deter would-be aggression towards him.
I think that so long as it was non-violent, Dr. King would consider doing it, if it advanced his cause.
Native Americans employed various non-violent tactics to advocate for their rights and resist oppression. These included peaceful protests, such as the "Trail of Broken Treaties" march in 1972, which aimed to highlight broken agreements with the U.S. government. They also utilized legal action to challenge injustices, forming organizations like the American Indian Movement (AIM) to promote awareness and activism through non-violent means. Additionally, cultural preservation efforts, such as traditional ceremonies and arts, served as a means of asserting identity and resilience without resorting to violence.
violent tratics of course
AIM used tactics that were often confrontational and violent.
Fasting in jail was one of Gandhi's major tactics in his non-violent revolution.
Non-violent Civil Disobedience
violent scare tactics
To defend themselves against violent criminals.
to abandon, violent, militant tactics in favor of civil disobedience
Nonviolent is the avoidance of violent actions.
NovaNet Answer: intellectual protest, economic boycotts, and violent intimidation.
The wspu supported violent tactics ......
ISIS stands for Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. It is a militant group known for its extremist ideology and violent tactics.
Yes, non-violent political tactics can be highly effective against governments and their actions. Strategies such as protests, civil disobedience, and grassroots organizing can mobilize public support, raise awareness, and pressure authorities to change policies. Historical examples, like the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S. and India's independence movement, demonstrate that non-violent resistance can lead to significant political and social change. Additionally, such tactics often garner greater legitimacy and moral authority, making it harder for governments to justify repression.