Rulers of city-states were responsible for maintaining order, enforcing laws, and ensuring the welfare of their citizens. They managed local economies, collected taxes, and oversaw public works and infrastructure projects. Additionally, they often acted as military leaders, defending the city-state from external threats, and engaged in diplomatic relations with neighboring states. Their role also included promoting cultural and religious activities, thus fostering a sense of community and identity among the inhabitants.
it included a number of independent city-states with competing rulers
They kept them in check with city states and each city state had a lord
It included a number of independent city-states with competing rulers.
Halach Uinic
The tyrants replaced the aristocrats as rulers of the city-states. Aristocrats are members of rich and powerful families and ruled most city states. A middle class of merchants and artisans developed, wanting a say in government. Gradually, strength in cities shifted from aristocrats to merchants and artisans. As a result, aristocratic government was replaced by rulers called tyrants. <---- this was an essay question on one of my tests in 6th grade- I got an A :) !
In Sparta, the two kings had religious duties. An Athens one of the archons carried religious duties. Similarly in other city-states, depending on their political structure.
it included a number of independent city-states with competing rulers
"The Prince"
Descended from the gods.
Each Phoenician city-state was independent, and had its own rulers and council.
Rulers of Renaissance city-states, such as Florence, Venice, and Milan, were responsible for maintaining political stability, promoting economic prosperity, and fostering cultural development. They often acted as patrons of the arts, supporting artists, architects, and scholars to enhance their city's prestige. Additionally, they managed diplomatic relations with other states and responded to threats, both internal and external, to ensure the security and autonomy of their city. Overall, their leadership was pivotal in shaping the cultural and political landscape of the Renaissance period.
city-states kkk kool kids klub......we have the awnsers Noob
They kept them in check with city states and each city state had a lord
It included a number of independent city-states with competing rulers.
Halach Uinic
it included a number of independent city-states with competing rulers
The tyrants replaced the aristocrats as rulers of the city-states. Aristocrats are members of rich and powerful families and ruled most city states. A middle class of merchants and artisans developed, wanting a say in government. Gradually, strength in cities shifted from aristocrats to merchants and artisans. As a result, aristocratic government was replaced by rulers called tyrants. <---- this was an essay question on one of my tests in 6th grade- I got an A :) !