Well Charles thought he had the Divine Right of Kings: That he was in some way appointed by God. Parliament argued differently. It offers me the problem as one who is anti republican, without being wholly Monarchist, does the Republic offer a better option ? In the case of one Oliver Cromwell the answer is a resounding No.
ggherbbyi
He was executed for high treason and acts of violence against the country.
No, the royalists did not revolt against King Charles; rather, they were supporters of his rule during the English Civil War. The conflict arose between the royalists, who supported King Charles I, and the Parliamentarians, who opposed his authority and sought to limit his power. The royalists fought to maintain the king's position, while the Parliamentarians aimed to establish a government that represented the people's interests. Ultimately, the war led to the trial and execution of Charles I in 1649.
King Charles I was a noble king who was described in many ways, such as selfish arrogant and self-obsessed. However, his disadvantage to his execution, was that he had a strong leader to fight against, Oliver Cromwell. He despised the King and all he wanted was to be free of being ruled by a king
There are no records of King Tutankhamun executing anyone or going to war.
King Charles
Because the army wanted to change the country to be the way they thought it should be and King Charles would have been dangerous to keep alive. Ironically, executing him was so unpopular that it probably ensured the return of the monarchy a little over a decade later.
ggherbbyi
He was executed for high treason and acts of violence against the country.
King Charles is charged with waging a war against Parliament and the people. He is thus responsible of all the following treason's:-Murders-Rape-Burnings-Damage-DesolationAll of these things were caused by the war that King Charles I started, he is therefore a Tyrant, Traitor and Murderer.
The Roundheads were the supporters of the British Parliament when it revolted against king Charles I in 1642.
the people that fought against Charles where the round-heads as they had their hair cut in a short simple manner.they people that fought for Charles were the royalists also know as cavaliers.
King Charles I of England is famous for being the losing leader in the English civil war of the 1640's against parliament. Charles was eventually beheaded. He is the only person ever to be made a saint by the Church of England
King Charles I of England was 48 when he was executed by beheading on the 30th of January 1649 for treason against England. He had been the King of England, Ireland and Scotland for 24 years before his execution.
There wasn't a King after King Charles I but there was Oliver Cromwell who ruled even though he wasn't supposed to. He was mean and strict, so the people kicked him out of Parliament and made King Charles II king, who was King Charles I son. Answer the question? Not to forget that there was a civil war, the Royalists (Kings people) against the Parliamentarians, who incidentally won that war. The country and Parliament realised having Oliver in charge as the Protector was not such a good thing, and as usual people close to him plotted and he was replaced by Charles 1 son Charles 11.
a king Charles spaniel with another king Charles spaniel
King Charles I was a noble king who was described in many ways, such as selfish arrogant and self-obsessed. However, his disadvantage to his execution, was that he had a strong leader to fight against, Oliver Cromwell. He despised the King and all he wanted was to be free of being ruled by a king