If the sugar revolution had not occurred, the economies of many Caribbean colonies would have developed differently, potentially relying more on subsistence agriculture or alternative cash crops. The demand for enslaved labor may have decreased, leading to a different trajectory for the transatlantic slave trade. Additionally, the cultural and social dynamics of the region would have shifted, as sugar cultivation significantly influenced local societies and economies. Overall, the absence of the sugar revolution would have altered economic patterns, colonial relationships, and social structures in the Americas.
No, the American Revolution did not have to occur. If King George 111 did not put taxes on everything he thought that the colonists might need the Revolution would not have started.
Off with your head!
When those in power are resistant to change. I would say the best answer is when there are social inequities -- perceived or actual.
the population of the moth would have change if its reversed by having
the population of the moth would have change if its reversed by having
No, the American Revolution did not have to occur. If King George 111 did not put taxes on everything he thought that the colonists might need the Revolution would not have started.
Sugar revolution is a new opening or new beginning for the sugar industry .It was made known that tobacco was the main export product in Europe but the Europeans sought it more or thought that sugar would bring more income to them and it would make them richer.
"Occur" would work, however, happen is appropriate in most situations.
There would be no sexual reproduction.
There would be no sexual reproduction.
Crystals of sugar are obtained.
You would have to add the sugar, because it does not occur naturally.
There Would No longer Be a Rock Cycle :(
There Would No longer Be a Rock Cycle :(
Death would occur.
they would not have escape and got freedom
Sperm would come out of your mouth