The comparisons between 1800 & 1940 are striking: If, & it is one big if, Napoleon can get from one side of the channel to the other then it is possible there will be success. Possible. But the arrival would be very hostile...
Britain and France
Soldiers probably would have kicked his but for trying to take us over but because of Napoleon the Louisiana purchase happened
Britain had an agreement with France that if Poland was invaded they would both step in to help.
Well, firstly, Napoleon made strict punishments for those who did not do all they could to help their country. In this way, if people were not nationalistic, then they would be greatly punished.
Napoleon I needed the money for future expansion in Europe and his war against Great Britain.
If Britain fell Germany would not be in a two front war when they invaded the Soviet Union, and would most likely have won the war with them. Resulting in Germany controlling most of Europe.
On September 1, 1939 Germany invaded Poland. Great Britain and France had warned Hitler that if he invaded Poland, they would declare war.
If they could it would have already happened
Britain is an island on which England, Wales and Scotland are on. Edward I was King of England. He invaded both Wales and Scotland, so he invaded other parts of Britain, but it would be incorrect to say he invaded Britain, as he was from England and was England's King, succeeding his father, Henry III.
i dont no
The British had promised the Belgians that they would support them if Germany attacked them. When Germany invaded Belgium, Britain declared war on Germany.
The chances of Canada being invaded by the US are non existent.
Britain and France
Soldiers probably would have kicked his but for trying to take us over but because of Napoleon the Louisiana purchase happened
Because without the navy Britain would have been invaded by the surrounding countries
They said that they would declare war on Germany
Britain had an agreement with France that if Poland was invaded they would both step in to help.