answersLogoWhite

0

A:In later centuries, many legends grew up around the persecution that Nero inflicted on the Christians, although several scholars have pointedly noted that no early Christian source makes that claim. Even Acts of the Apostles is very approving of the Roman authorities, although the author must have known of any persecution if such had really happened. What we do know for certain is that Nero blamed the Christians of Rome for the Great Fire, probably unfairly. Other sources say that he inflicted terrible punishments on the Roman Christians, and this could be true although some of the stories seem inconsistent with the available evidence. The numbers are uncertain but could be in the low hundreds. The consensus of scholars is that, apart from this incident, Nero ignored the Christians.
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History
Related Questions

Emperor Nero and his reasons in persecuting christians?

The reason for Nero's persecution of Christians may be attributed to the Great Fire of Rome in 64 AD. The city was reduced to rubble and although many thought that Nero may have been responsible for the blaze, a few sources say that Christians may have confessed to the crime, although by free will or by torture is unknown. Because of this, Nero and the community placed the blame on the Christians, and thus they suffered greatly, by being crucified, thrown to dogs, and burned.


Why did the Romans persecute christians during the reign of Nero?

According to the story, the Christians were used as scapegoats because of accusations that Nero had started the great fire of Rome


Who were the emperors persecuting Christians in Rome in 64 CE?

There were no emperors persecuting the Christians in 64 AD. This is a misconception. 64 was the year of the Great Fire of Rome and the emperor Nero was in power. Nero did not persecute the Christians for their religion. Nero punished the Christians for the crime of arson. After the outrage died down, the Christians were free to worship as they saw fit.


Who was the Roman emperor that began the persecution of christians?

It is generally agreed that there was no organised, general, centrally directed persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire before the edict of Emperor Decius in 249. This remained in effect until 251 CE. The "great persecution" of Christians was initiated by Emperor Diocletian in 303 CE. It lasted until 305 in the West, but continued until 311 in the East.


How did Emperor Nero use a great fire that swept through Rome to persecute the Christian?

he told the people that the Christians had started the fire.


Did the Moors persecute Christians?

Yes, the Moors did persecute the Early Christians.


Why was the first Pope Peter executed?

St. Peter, the first pope, was ordered executed by the Roman Emperor Nero because he was a Christian and Nero had decided to blame the great fire that destroyed much of Rome in the year 64 on the Christians.


What was Neros reaction to the refusal of the christians to respect the roman gods and goddesses?

Nero didn't persecute Christians because they wouldn't worship the gods. He used them as scapegoats for problems in the City, starting with the fire of 64 AD (which Nero himself likely had started so that he could build a palace on the site).


Did Nero grant Christians freedom of religion after the persecution?

Nero did not actually persecute the Christians as later emperors did. He rounded them up and punished those he found for the crime of arson. After conditions calmed down, he let them alone and they were free to practice their religion, although they were still considered a "suspicious cult" by many.


Who did Romans persecute?

Christians:)


Why did emperor Nero blame Christians for the big fire in Rome and persecute them?

Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecuted them for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.


Who did saul persecute?

Christ-Christians