According to the Declaration of Independence, governments are established to secure the rights of mankind, such as the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. These rights, according to the Declaration, are unalienable, meaning they cannot be taken away. When any form of government becomes "destructive of these ends" (the unalienable rights of the citizens), it is the right of the citizens to "alter or abolish" that government, and establish a new government that will protect the rights of the people.
The Government and instituting a Protestant Dictatorship!
== ==
research b_itch
Yes and No. Yes because when the government fials to enforce the law citizens must be able to act towards self preservation. No because vigilantism leads to more violence and instability becuause it ignores human rights and set laws. ==CJ 92== The best thing to do is sort the government out, if that fails then vigilantism is justified.
The "Civil War" established the sovereignty of the Washington DC federal government over the states, thereby abolishing the independence of the states, and the Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
They can abolish their government and replace their government. Abolishing means to get rid of...
The Government and instituting a Protestant Dictatorship!
they would oppose the US government because they believe in abolishing the government. In other words, they do not want a government.
in 1833
by being great
of course it was justified! The Egyptian people were mistreated and exploited by an insanley corrupt government.
== ==
It justified the reasons for changing government.
abolishing means destroying completely. like in this sentence: "We are abolishing the government." this is a great online dictionary http://dictionary.reference.com/ you can also find a thesaurus and reference section on this website. i hope i helped u, sincerely, Person Helper
Abolishing private property was Lenin's first act on taking control in Russia.
Abolishing the Borders from Below was created in 2001.
Steven Fogg has written: 'Government advertising - is it justified?'