When the government failed to protect their rights
John Locke believed that rebellion against government was not appropriate when a government was functioning effectively and protecting the natural rights of its citizens—namely, life, liberty, and property. He argued that people should only rebel when a government becomes tyrannical and fails to uphold these rights, thereby losing its legitimacy. In such circumstances, citizens have the right to overthrow a government that violates the social contract.
John Locke believed that society needed a government based on the principles of democracy and the social contract. He argued for a government that protects individuals' natural rights to life, liberty, and property, and that derives its authority from the consent of the governed. Locke emphasized the importance of limited government, separation of powers, and the right of the people to overthrow a government that fails to uphold their rights.
The government shouldn't try to influence the way people think. The government should present facts and allow people to vote how they feel.
John Locke believed that it would be acceptable for the people to overthrow the government when it fails to protect their natural rights to life, liberty, and property. He argued that if a government becomes oppressive, violates the social contract, or acts against the interests of its citizens, the people have the right to revolt. This principle is rooted in the idea that legitimate government is based on the consent of the governed, and when that consent is broken, the people are justified in seeking change.
He proposed people should think for themselves and all had god given rights to property and protection.
He states that people have a right to change the government. The thing about Locke is that he wrote this in a time when only kings had ruled for a thousand years. It was a revolutionary thought for it’s time.
One of the Enlightenment thinkers who believed that people had the right to overthrow bad governments was John Locke. Locke argued that if a government fails to protect the natural rights of its citizens – life, liberty, and property – then the people have the right to rebel and establish a new government.
John Locke believed that rebellion against government was not appropriate when a government was functioning effectively and protecting the natural rights of its citizens—namely, life, liberty, and property. He argued that people should only rebel when a government becomes tyrannical and fails to uphold these rights, thereby losing its legitimacy. In such circumstances, citizens have the right to overthrow a government that violates the social contract.
A Democratic System
Locke felt that if a government does not protect the people's rights, the people have the right to dissolve that government. This sentiment affected the writing of the Declaration of Independence.John Locke, a philosopher in 1689, put forth the argument that governments that failed to protect the natural rights of its citizens were subject to change by a revolution if necessary.
John Locke believed that society needed a government based on the principles of democracy and the social contract. He argued for a government that protects individuals' natural rights to life, liberty, and property, and that derives its authority from the consent of the governed. Locke emphasized the importance of limited government, separation of powers, and the right of the people to overthrow a government that fails to uphold their rights.
The government shouldn't try to influence the way people think. The government should present facts and allow people to vote how they feel.
the people
he thought that people weremoral and reasonable
i think its government
i think they should because then people know if the government is doing its job and it is a comment to the government what needs doing in there country
John Locke believed that it would be acceptable for the people to overthrow the government when it fails to protect their natural rights to life, liberty, and property. He argued that if a government becomes oppressive, violates the social contract, or acts against the interests of its citizens, the people have the right to revolt. This principle is rooted in the idea that legitimate government is based on the consent of the governed, and when that consent is broken, the people are justified in seeking change.