we didn't.
I think it had a good effect on the Native Americans because it guaranteed freedom of religion and trials by jury.
By Bartolome de Las Casas fighting for the Native Americans to change the kings mind to issue laws by ordering the freedom of all enslaved Native Americans.
there incomplete freedom
British who promised back ancestrial land and freedom
Both Latins and Native Americans had significant stakes in fighting for their rights and territories, but Native Americans arguably had more to gain. For Native Americans, resistance was crucial to preserving their land, culture, and way of life in the face of colonization and displacement. In contrast, while Latins sought social and political rights, their integration into broader societal structures often provided them with avenues for progress that weren't available to Native Americans. Ultimately, the fight for survival and autonomy made the stakes higher for Native Americans.
Probably land.
native Americans
no
Native Americans lived on the same land as the Americans did. They share a lot of cultures,arts,and freedom.
The Europeans gained control over the Native Americans by taking their land and their important riches.
I think it had a good effect on the Native Americans because it guaranteed freedom of religion and trials by jury.
By Bartolome de Las Casas fighting for the Native Americans to change the kings mind to issue laws by ordering the freedom of all enslaved Native Americans.
native americans
who is king philip and what is his real name
there incomplete freedom
yes:)
British who promised back ancestrial land and freedom