It has been said that the Roman army used the hi-tech weapons of their day. The individuals used swords, the gladius being the ideal thrusting weapon for the infantry. They also carried knives and javelins and used a shield for protection and also for crowding/pushing at the enemy. The cavalry used the spatha, which was a long sword appropriate for a horse fighter. As far as the artillery, they used "balista" which is a catchall term for any long range throwing device. Included in this category were the catapults which threw rocks/boulders, the scorpion, which shot high speed arrows, and the onager which did the same. Flaming arrows were also used. They used bowmen and slingers who were usually auxiliaries. A lead shot thrown by a slinger could pierce armor, much like our present day bullets. By the way, when they used lead or stone shot, they had a habit of writing insults on the missiles.
It has been said that the Roman army used the hi-tech weapons of their day. The individuals used swords, the gladius being the ideal thrusting weapon for the infantry. They also carried knives and javelins and used a shield for protection and also for crowding/pushing at the enemy. The cavalry used the spatha, which was a long sword appropriate for a horse fighter. As far as the artillery, they used "balista" which is a catchall term for any long range throwing device. Included in this category were the catapults which threw rocks/boulders, the scorpion, which shot high speed arrows, and the onager which did the same. Flaming arrows were also used. They used bowmen and slingers who were usually auxiliaries. A lead shot thrown by a slinger could pierce armor, much like our present day bullets. By the way, when they used lead or stone shot, they had a habit of writing insults on the missiles.
It has been said that the Roman army used the hi-tech weapons of their day. The individuals used swords, the gladius being the ideal thrusting weapon for the infantry. They also carried knives and javelins and used a shield for protection and also for crowding/pushing at the enemy. The cavalry used the spatha, which was a long sword appropriate for a horse fighter. As far as the artillery, they used "balista" which is a catchall term for any long range throwing device. Included in this category were the catapults which threw rocks/boulders, the scorpion, which shot high speed arrows, and the onager which did the same. Flaming arrows were also used. They used bowmen and slingers who were usually auxiliaries. A lead shot thrown by a slinger could pierce armor, much like our present day bullets. By the way, when they used lead or stone shot, they had a habit of writing insults on the missiles.
It has been said that the Roman army used the hi-tech weapons of their day. The individuals used swords, the gladius being the ideal thrusting weapon for the infantry. They also carried knives and javelins and used a shield for protection and also for crowding/pushing at the enemy. The cavalry used the spatha, which was a long sword appropriate for a horse fighter. As far as the artillery, they used "balista" which is a catchall term for any long range throwing device. Included in this category were the catapults which threw rocks/boulders, the scorpion, which shot high speed arrows, and the onager which did the same. Flaming arrows were also used. They used bowmen and slingers who were usually auxiliaries. A lead shot thrown by a slinger could pierce armor, much like our present day bullets. By the way, when they used lead or stone shot, they had a habit of writing insults on the missiles.
It has been said that the Roman army used the hi-tech weapons of their day. The individuals used swords, the gladius being the ideal thrusting weapon for the infantry. They also carried knives and javelins and used a shield for protection and also for crowding/pushing at the enemy. The cavalry used the spatha, which was a long sword appropriate for a horse fighter. As far as the artillery, they used "balista" which is a catchall term for any long range throwing device. Included in this category were the catapults which threw rocks/boulders, the scorpion, which shot high speed arrows, and the onager which did the same. Flaming arrows were also used. They used bowmen and slingers who were usually auxiliaries. A lead shot thrown by a slinger could pierce armor, much like our present day bullets. By the way, when they used lead or stone shot, they had a habit of writing insults on the missiles.
It has been said that the Roman army used the hi-tech weapons of their day. The individuals used swords, the gladius being the ideal thrusting weapon for the infantry. They also carried knives and javelins and used a shield for protection and also for crowding/pushing at the enemy. The cavalry used the spatha, which was a long sword appropriate for a horse fighter. As far as the artillery, they used "balista" which is a catchall term for any long range throwing device. Included in this category were the catapults which threw rocks/boulders, the scorpion, which shot high speed arrows, and the onager which did the same. Flaming arrows were also used. They used bowmen and slingers who were usually auxiliaries. A lead shot thrown by a slinger could pierce armor, much like our present day bullets. By the way, when they used lead or stone shot, they had a habit of writing insults on the missiles.
It has been said that the Roman army used the hi-tech weapons of their day. The individuals used swords, the gladius being the ideal thrusting weapon for the infantry. They also carried knives and javelins and used a shield for protection and also for crowding/pushing at the enemy. The cavalry used the spatha, which was a long sword appropriate for a horse fighter. As far as the artillery, they used "balista" which is a catchall term for any long range throwing device. Included in this category were the catapults which threw rocks/boulders, the scorpion, which shot high speed arrows, and the onager which did the same. Flaming arrows were also used. They used bowmen and slingers who were usually auxiliaries. A lead shot thrown by a slinger could pierce armor, much like our present day bullets. By the way, when they used lead or stone shot, they had a habit of writing insults on the missiles.
It has been said that the Roman army used the hi-tech weapons of their day. The individuals used swords, the gladius being the ideal thrusting weapon for the infantry. They also carried knives and javelins and used a shield for protection and also for crowding/pushing at the enemy. The cavalry used the spatha, which was a long sword appropriate for a horse fighter. As far as the artillery, they used "balista" which is a catchall term for any long range throwing device. Included in this category were the catapults which threw rocks/boulders, the scorpion, which shot high speed arrows, and the onager which did the same. Flaming arrows were also used. They used bowmen and slingers who were usually auxiliaries. A lead shot thrown by a slinger could pierce armor, much like our present day bullets. By the way, when they used lead or stone shot, they had a habit of writing insults on the missiles.
It has been said that the Roman army used the hi-tech weapons of their day. The individuals used swords, the gladius being the ideal thrusting weapon for the infantry. They also carried knives and javelins and used a shield for protection and also for crowding/pushing at the enemy. The cavalry used the spatha, which was a long sword appropriate for a horse fighter. As far as the artillery, they used "balista" which is a catchall term for any long range throwing device. Included in this category were the catapults which threw rocks/boulders, the scorpion, which shot high speed arrows, and the onager which did the same. Flaming arrows were also used. They used bowmen and slingers who were usually auxiliaries. A lead shot thrown by a slinger could pierce armor, much like our present day bullets. By the way, when they used lead or stone shot, they had a habit of writing insults on the missiles.
No, there were weapons way before the Roman Empire.
The Romans made their weapons.
The Romans used weapons to fight and win their opponent. Romans had at least two weapons on them at the same time just to be safe. :)
No, the Romans did not invent bowls. Bowls were around for thousands of years before the Romans existd.
No. People other than the Romans had teeth.
No, there were weapons way before the Roman Empire.
The Romans didn't invent the microscope
The Romans made their weapons.
The Romans invented concrete.
The Romans invented concrete.
The Romans used weapons to fight and win their opponent. Romans had at least two weapons on them at the same time just to be safe. :)
No
No.
No.
No.
no
No.