0
President Andrew Jackson supported the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which authorized the forced relocation of Native American tribes from their ancestral lands. This policy was implemented with force, notably during the Trail of Tears in the late 1830s, where thousands of Cherokee and other tribes were forcibly removed from their homes, leading to widespread suffering and significant loss of life. Jackson's administration used military power to enforce these removals, reflecting his commitment to westward expansion at the expense of indigenous peoples.
What else can I help you with?
List the following events in the order in which they happened. and Acirc and nbsp Jackson supports the Indian Removal Act with force. The Supreme Court says Georgia Indian laws are unconstitutional. a?
The correct order of events is as follows: First, the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia's laws regarding the Cherokee Nation were unconstitutional, which occurred in the case of Worcester v. Georgia in 1832. Despite this ruling, President Andrew Jackson supported the Indian Removal Act and enforced its implementation, leading to the forced relocation of Native Americans.
What was the second gread indian removal?
The second great Indian removal was a policy in the United States to relocate Indian tribes. This was often done by force or trickery.
How did Indian groups in the Midwest and southeast resist removal?
The Indian groups decided to resist their removal by using force and fighting back. They started a few wars.
Best description of the Indian Removal Act?
Enacted by President Andrew Jackson in 1830, it was meant to encourage/assist/force member of the "five civilized tribes" from eastern states, particularly Georgia, to move west into the "Indian Territory", now Oklahoma. This act led to the Trail of Tears and more atrocities. the trail of tears was from 1830-1838
What statement best explains the Indian Removal Act?
It was used to force Indians from their homes.
The Supreme Court says Georgia Indian laws are unconstitutional. Cherokee fight for the US in the War of 1812. Jackson supports the Indian Removal Act with force.?
1. Cherokee fight for the United States in the War of 18122. The Supreme Court says Georgia Indian laws are unconstitutional3. Jackson supp0rts the Indian Removal Act with force(Apex)
List the following events in the order in which they happened. and Acirc and nbsp Jackson supports the Indian Removal Act with force. The Supreme Court says Georgia Indian laws are unconstitutional. a?
The correct order of events is as follows: First, the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia's laws regarding the Cherokee Nation were unconstitutional, which occurred in the case of Worcester v. Georgia in 1832. Despite this ruling, President Andrew Jackson supported the Indian Removal Act and enforced its implementation, leading to the forced relocation of Native Americans.
Why did Andrew Jackson remove the Indians?
Andrew Jackson just wanted to get rid of the Indians he didn't really care about them.
Was the Indian Removal Act wrote by a specific person?
The Indian Removal Act was passed through congress by Andrew Jackson in 1830. This act allowed Andrew Jackson to negotiate removal of the Indians east of the Mississippi. It was once thought that America would never expand past the Mississippi, so they could force Indians to go there and Americans would not have to bother with them. This started almost thirty years of force migrations of tribes to areas west of the Mississippi.
What was the second gread indian removal?
The second great Indian removal was a policy in the United States to relocate Indian tribes. This was often done by force or trickery.
List the following events in the correct chronological order Indians leave Georgia on the Trail of Tears the supreme court overturns the Georgia laws affecting Indians gold is discovered?
1; Gold Is Discovered In Georgia 2; The Supreme Coury Says Georgia Indian Laws Are Unconstitutional 3; Jackson Supports The Indian Removal Act With Force - Apexx :)
How did Indian groups in the Midwest and southeast resist removal?
The Indian groups decided to resist their removal by using force and fighting back. They started a few wars.
Best description of the Indian Removal Act?
Enacted by President Andrew Jackson in 1830, it was meant to encourage/assist/force member of the "five civilized tribes" from eastern states, particularly Georgia, to move west into the "Indian Territory", now Oklahoma. This act led to the Trail of Tears and more atrocities. the trail of tears was from 1830-1838
What best describes jackson's policy toward indian peoples?
He kicked soccer ball them allTHAT ^ IS NOT THE ANSWER THIS IS >Jackson also espoused removing Indian tribes in the United States to the west of the Mississippi River as one of his reforms. Jackson argued that the United States policy of attempting to assimilate Indian tribes into white society had failed and it would destroy the Indians’ way of life. Furthermore, Jackson recognized that whites desired Indian lands and he feared that if they remained in those areas that they would eventually be exterminated. Opposition groups fought Jackson’s removal policy in Congress, but their efforts failed by just a handful of votes. Congress’s authorization of removal empowered Jackson to make treaties with the Indian tribes to arrange for their removal. Jackson, who railed against government corruption, largely ignored the shady treaties forced on the various tribes and the actions of government officials. The Indian Removal process was completed two years after Jackson left office with great loss of Indian life due to corruption, inadequate supplies, and the removal of many Indians by force. Today, Jackson’s Indian Removal policy and its tragic consequences that produced the Trail of Tears is the most conspicuous blight on his presidential legacy. www.thehermitage.com
What best explains the Indian removal act?
It was used to force Indians from their homes.
How did Jackson's Indian Policy lay the groundwork for the future?
Jackson's Indian Policy laid the groundwork for how future presidents often dealt with Indians--by force.
What statement best explains the Indian Removal Act?
It was used to force Indians from their homes.
