To provide an accurate response, I would need to know which specific primary source you are referring to. Primary sources can vary widely in terms of their creation dates, depending on the document, artifact, or work in question. Please specify the primary source for a precise answer.
No this is a secondary source. A primary sourced is something written in documents or by authors of the time of the subject of the study.
A "primary source" is a description of the event written by the people who experienced it. A "secondary source" is a description written by people who read the books that the primary-source people wrote. So, a "primary source" for the Battle of Bunker Hill would be written by the soldiers who fought the battle or who observed it first-hand. Each person saw only a PART of the battle; the part he was involved in. Even for such a small battle as Bunker Hill, no one person saw it all; some things were happening on the other side of the hill. A "primary source" can also be written by asking questions of people who were there. The "Secondary sources" read the books that the eye-witness observers and participants wrote, sometimes decades later.
it is a primary source
Primary source.
Yes, it is it comes from another person. It depends. A quote from a person who experienced your topic would be a primary source.
A primary source is a source material that is closely related to the subject discribed with in.
The use of an artifact as a primary source is different than the use of a written primary source because when you exacavate for an artifact, you may have to make guesses. However, with a written primary source, you don't need to guess as the writing inside will have the answers to your questions or guesses.
It depends on what you need it for :)
Primary Source - Apex Learning
i think they are a primary source.... yes it is a primary source
It is a primary source because it came directly from him. An analysis of the speech written by a columnist would be a secondary source.
Primary Source: a firsthand account, also something written by someone who was there. Secondary source: a secondhand account also something written by someone who was not there.
No, a primary source is a contemporary account. To write it now creates a secondary source.
written or created by a person who experienced an event
No, it would be a secondary source. A primary source is written by someone who was there when it happened. If the author happened to participate or witness a Spanish mission, then it would be a primary source. Secondary sources are based off things that people learn from a primary source or a different secondary source.
A primary source for Joan of Arc could be anything written or painted about her in her time 1412-1431.
No this is a secondary source. A primary sourced is something written in documents or by authors of the time of the subject of the study.