0
What else can I help you with?
Why did the Serbs of Greeks revolt?
the ottomans were oppresing the greeks.yeah in some areas they co existed but it was rare.ottomans oppresed religion and were not equeal (greeks and serbs had to pay large taxes,their children were taken away and manipulated into becoming ottoman warriors) also they could not express their orthodox religion (if you were christian you died) so yeah,it was dark times for them, + they wanted their own nation since ottomans were conquerers
What would have happened if the Serbs won the battle of Maritsa?
What happened at the battle of MaritsaThe battle of Maritsa was a successful campaign by an outnumbered Ottoman garrison which won due to the bad commanding by King Vukašin Mrnjavčević and his brother Despot Jovan UglješkaHad Mrnjavčević's forcces been better positioned or not so easy ambushed ( less then 100 guards & on low ground flanked by 3 high points ) , the Serbs could have won the battle .. Furthermore his forces are estimated to number around 60,000 , opposing a mere 800 Ottomans . In the initial ambush Mrnjavčević was killed , so 2nd in command Jovan Uglješka ordered his troops not to fight but to charge over the river abandoning all but a weapon per person , Over 20,000 drowned , and a 25,000 Serbs was killed in the battle . After the failure , around 2 thirds deserted , and the rest retreated . Those who stayed joined onto the forces of King Lazar of Serbia , and would fight at the battle of Kosovo .How the Serbs could've won the battle of MaritsaThere are many ways that the Serbs could've won the battle of Maritsa . One would be for the 60,000 troops to stay and fight the 800 Ottomans . This would result in a casualty rate of around 1 Ottoman death : 5 Serbian deaths , but this would not only mean victory but a significantly lower casualty rate .Another way would've been more guards patrolling , which would have inevitably intercepted the Ottomans and woken the army .There are many other ways to ensure a Serbian victory also .what would've happened if the Serbs won .Had the Serbians achieved victory at the battle of Maritsa , it would not be known as a significant battle but an extremely overrated failed Ottoman raid . Mrnjavčević's aim was to recapture Adrianople , and to get revenge for the Ottoman surprise attack at the battle of Sırp Sındığı , in which the Ottomans captured Thrace and blockaded Constantinople ( of the Byzantine Empire ) . Therefore , the bulk of the Ottoman forces would've engaged Mrnjavčević's army , and both sides would likely have taken heavy casualties . Had the Serbs also won this battle ( either side would have had about a 50 % chance of wining ) they would have captured Thrace , and that would be it for them . This would open the way for pro-byzantine crusades ( especially helped by Hungarians and Walichians ) , and the Ottoman Empire would fall . Mrnjavčević would continue on his original intentions after this , to capture Skoder . In later years , him and his ally Lazar the Serb would probably re-unite the Serbian Empire . The empire would conquer the small states in modern day norther Greece & possibly Bulgaria . They instead of the Ottomans would contend with Austria-Hungary over Bosnia/Croatia/Vojvodina . The Balkan wars wouldn't happen , the Russians would have uncontested control of the Caucasus and north-east turkey , Crimea would also be owned by the Russian Empire and the Crimean war would never happen . WW1 would still happen , because of the clashes between the West European powers , and the tensions between Serbia and Austria-Hungary & Germany and Russia would still exist . History out of the Balkans & black sea would remain the same until the build up to WW1 . The Serbian Empire would be easy to hold together as all ethic groups are south slavs with similar cultures , and the Serbs would be preferred by slavs over Austria-Hungary . The tensions and border disputes that the Balkans and Caucasus are famous for would not exist either . Russia , with no Ottoman Empire would be without contenders after the great northern war ( until Germany in the 19 hundreds ) . This would allow them to grow and modernise , and not be so was against Germany in WW1 , and there would be no February and October revolutions , and no Brest-Litovsk treaty . The central powers would suffer an even heavier defeat , and a Versailes treaty with an occupied Poland & Rhineland , some of or even all of Austria-hangary ( apart from Czechoslovakia ) occupied by Tsarist Russia , The Serbian Empire and Italy . Finland would not be independent & Japan would be able to run wild across Asia . China would be harder to take as without communism there would be no civil war . America wouldn't even be involved in a first world war with no Ottoman Empire and an overpowerfull Russia and Serbia . The wars quick success would prevent need for the league of nations and imperialism would continue , probably into the 21st century .If the Ottomans won , then history would go the same until the battle of Kosovo , in which the Ottomans would be significantly weaker . It is probably safe to say , that even if history in the Balkans went unchanged ( they still won at Kosovo & Varna ) , the Ottomans would be weaker and face problems due to this either in the caucasus , Crimean or North African conquests . The majority of history however , would remain unchanged .
What would've happened if the Serbs won at Maritsa?
What happened at the battle of MaritsaThe battle of Maritsa was a successful campaign by an outnumbered Ottoman garrison which won due to the bad commanding by King Vukašin Mrnjavčević and his brother Despot Jovan UglješkaHad Mrnjavčević's forcces been better positioned or not so easy ambushed ( less then 100 guards & on low ground flanked by 3 high points ) , the Serbs could have won the battle .. Furthermore his forces are estimated to number around 60,000 , opposing a mere 800 Ottomans . In the initial ambush Mrnjavčević was killed , so 2nd in command Jovan Uglješka ordered his troops not to fight but to charge over the river abandoning all but a weapon per person , Over 20,000 drowned , and a 25,000 Serbs was killed in the battle . After the failure , around 2 thirds deserted , and the rest retreated . Those who stayed joined onto the forces of King Lazar of Serbia , and would fight at the battle of Kosovo .How the Serbs could've won the battle of MaritsaThere are many ways that the Serbs could've won the battle of Maritsa . One would be for the 60,000 troops to stay and fight the 800 Ottomans . This would result in a casualty rate of around 1 Ottoman death : 5 Serbian deaths , but this would not only mean victory but a significantly lower casualty rate .Another way would've been more guards patrolling , which would have inevitably intercepted the Ottomans and woken the army .There are many other ways to ensure a Serbian victory also .what would've happened if the Serbs won .Had the Serbians achieved victory at the battle of Maritsa , it would not be known as a significant battle but an extremely overrated failed Ottoman raid . Mrnjavčević's aim was to recapture Adrianople , and to get revenge for the Ottoman surprise attack at the battle of Sırp Sındığı , in which the Ottomans captured Thrace and blockaded Constantinople ( of the Byzantine Empire ) . Therefore , the bulk of the Ottoman forces would've engaged Mrnjavčević's army , and both sides would likely have taken heavy casualties . Had the Serbs also won this battle ( either side would have had about a 50 % chance of wining ) they would have captured Thrace , and that would be it for them . This would open the way for pro-byzantine crusades ( especially helped by Hungarians and Walichians ) , and the Ottoman Empire would fall . Mrnjavčević would continue on his original intentions after this , to capture Skoder . In later years , him and his ally Lazar the Serb would probably re-unite the Serbian Empire . The empire would conquer the small states in modern day norther Greece & possibly Bulgaria . They instead of the Ottomans would contend with Austria-Hungary over Bosnia/Croatia/Vojvodina . The Balkan wars wouldn't happen , the Russians would have uncontested control of the Caucasus and north-east turkey , Crimea would also be owned by the Russian Empire and the Crimean war would never happen . WW1 would still happen , because of the clashes between the West European powers , and the tensions between Serbia and Austria-Hungary & Germany and Russia would still exist . History out of the Balkans & black sea would remain the same until the build up to WW1 . The Serbian Empire would be easy to hold together as all ethic groups are south slavs with similar cultures , and the Serbs would be preferred by slavs over Austria-Hungary . The tensions and border disputes that the Balkans and Caucasus are famous for would not exist either . Russia , with no Ottoman Empire would be without contenders after the great northern war ( until Germany in the 19 hundreds ) . This would allow them to grow and modernise , and not be so was against Germany in WW1 , and there would be no February and October revolutions , and no Brest-Litovsk treaty . The central powers would suffer an even heavier defeat , and a Versailes treaty with an occupied Poland & Rhineland , some of or even all of Austria-hangary ( apart from Czechoslovakia ) occupied by Tsarist Russia , The Serbian Empire and Italy . Finland would not be independent & Japan would be able to run wild across Asia . China would be harder to take as without communism there would be no civil war . America wouldn't even be involved in a first world war with no Ottoman Empire and an overpowerfull Russia and Serbia . The wars quick success would prevent need for the league of nations and imperialism would continue , probably into the 21st century .If the Ottomans won , then history would go the same until the battle of Kosovo , in which the Ottomans would be significantly weaker . It is probably safe to say , that even if history in the Balkans went unchanged ( they still won at Kosovo & Varna ) , the Ottomans would be weaker and face problems due to this either in the caucasus , Crimean or North African conquests . The majority of history however , would remain unchanged .
What would have happened if the Ottoman Empire lost the battle of Maritsa?
What happened at the battle of MaritsaThe battle of Maritsa was a successful campaign by an outnumbered Ottoman garrison which won due to the bad commanding by King Vukašin Mrnjavčević and his brother Despot Jovan UglješkaHad Mrnjavčević's forcces been better positioned or not so easy ambushed ( less then 100 guards & on low ground flanked by 3 high points ) , the Serbs could have won the battle .. Furthermore his forces are estimated to number around 60,000 , opposing a mere 800 Ottomans . In the initial ambush Mrnjavčević was killed , so 2nd in command Jovan Uglješka ordered his troops not to fight but to charge over the river abandoning all but a weapon per person , Over 20,000 drowned , and a 25,000 Serbs was killed in the battle . After the failure , around 2 thirds deserted , and the rest retreated . Those who stayed joined onto the forces of King Lazar of Serbia , and would fight at the battle of Kosovo .How the Serbs could've won the battle of MaritsaThere are many ways that the Serbs could've won the battle of Maritsa . One would be for the 60,000 troops to stay and fight the 800 Ottomans . This would result in a casualty rate of around 1 Ottoman death : 5 Serbian deaths , but this would not only mean victory but a significantly lower casualty rate .Another way would've been more guards patrolling , which would have inevitably intercepted the Ottomans and woken the army .There are many other ways to ensure a Serbian victory also .what would've happened if the Serbs won .Had the Serbians achieved victory at the battle of Maritsa , it would not be known as a significant battle but an extremely overrated failed Ottoman raid . Mrnjavčević's aim was to recapture Adrianople , and to get revenge for the Ottoman surprise attack at the battle of Sırp Sındığı , in which the Ottomans captured Thrace and blockaded Constantinople ( of the Byzantine Empire ) . Therefore , the bulk of the Ottoman forces would've engaged Mrnjavčević's army , and both sides would likely have taken heavy casualties . Had the Serbs also won this battle ( either side would have had about a 50 % chance of wining ) they would have captured Thrace , and that would be it for them . This would open the way for pro-byzantine crusades ( especially helped by Hungarians and Walichians ) , and the Ottoman Empire would fall . Mrnjavčević would continue on his original intentions after this , to capture Skoder . In later years , him and his ally Lazar the Serb would probably re-unite the Serbian Empire . The empire would conquer the small states in modern day norther Greece & possibly Bulgaria . They instead of the Ottomans would contend with Austria-Hungary over Bosnia/Croatia/Vojvodina . The Balkan wars wouldn't happen , the Russians would have uncontested control of the Caucasus and north-east turkey , Crimea would also be owned by the Russian Empire and the Crimean war would never happen . WW1 would still happen , because of the clashes between the West European powers , and the tensions between Serbia and Austria-Hungary & Germany and Russia would still exist . History out of the Balkans & black sea would remain the same until the build up to WW1 . The Serbian Empire would be easy to hold together as all ethic groups are south slavs with similar cultures , and the Serbs would be preferred by slavs over Austria-Hungary . The tensions and border disputes that the Balkans and Caucasus are famous for would not exist either . Russia , with no Ottoman Empire would be without contenders after the great northern war ( until Germany in the 19 hundreds ) . This would allow them to grow and modernise , and not be so was against Germany in WW1 , and there would be no February and October revolutions , and no Brest-Litovsk treaty . The central powers would suffer an even heavier defeat , and a Versailes treaty with an occupied Poland & Rhineland , some of or even all of Austria-hangary ( apart from Czechoslovakia ) occupied by Tsarist Russia , The Serbian Empire and Italy . Finland would not be independent & Japan would be able to run wild across Asia . China would be harder to take as without communism there would be no civil war . America wouldn't even be involved in a first world war with no Ottoman Empire and an overpowerfull Russia and Serbia . The wars quick success would prevent need for the league of nations and imperialism would continue , probably into the 21st century .If the Ottomans won , then history would go the same until the battle of Kosovo , in which the Ottomans would be significantly weaker . It is probably safe to say , that even if history in the Balkans went unchanged ( they still won at Kosovo & Varna ) , the Ottomans would be weaker and face problems due to this either in the caucasus , Crimean or North African conquests . The majority of history however , would remain unchanged .
When do the serbs celebrate their defeat to the Turks?
Because they have no victories to celebrate.
Why did the Serbs of Greeks revolt?
the ottomans were oppresing the greeks.yeah in some areas they co existed but it was rare.ottomans oppresed religion and were not equeal (greeks and serbs had to pay large taxes,their children were taken away and manipulated into becoming ottoman warriors) also they could not express their orthodox religion (if you were christian you died) so yeah,it was dark times for them, + they wanted their own nation since ottomans were conquerers
What did Serbs and other Balkan people join together to form following world war?
They formeda nationalism movement which made the ottomans lose total control of balkans
What Selena Gomez thoughts about Serbs?
Serbs are like any other people so she thinks good about serbs
What happened at the battle of maritsa?
The battle of Maritsa was a successful campaign by an outnumbered Ottoman garrison which won due to the bad commanding by King Vukašin Mrnjavčević and his brother Despot Jovan UglješkaHad Mrnjavčević's forcces been better positioned or not so easy ambushed ( less then 100 guards & on low ground flanked by 3 high points ) , the Serbs could have won the battle .. Furthermore his forces are estimated to number around 60,000 , opposing a mere 800 Ottomans . In the initial ambush Mrnjavčević was killed , so 2nd in command Jovan Uglješka ordered his troops not to fight but to charge over the river abandoning all but a weapon per person , Over 20,000 drowned , and a 25,000 Serbs was killed in the battle . After the failure , around 2 thirds deserted , and the rest retreated . Those who stayed joined onto the forces of King Lazar of Serbia , and would fight at the battle of Kosovo .
When was Party of Danube Serbs created?
Party of Danube Serbs was created in 1998.
How are the serbs and croats different?
Croats are Roman Catholic and the Serbs are Orthodox Catholic
When was Democratic Party of Serbs in Macedonia created?
Democratic Party of Serbs in Macedonia was created in 1992.
Why is Vojvodina not Indepedent from Serbia?
Most citizens of province of Vojvodina are Serbs, like rest of Serbia (Kosovo excluded, where only few thousand Serbs left in enclaves after USA campaign). Therefor, Serbs from Vojvodina do not need separation from Serbs from central Serbia.
Are serbs Christian?
AnswerSerbians are generally Christians. It is the Bosnians who are majority Muslim.
Is kosovo serbian or albanian?
Kosovo is definitely Serbian. Throughout history it has proven to be an important region for the Serbs and it is part of their original homeland. Many serbs have died here including Prince Lazar Of Serbia in defence of the Serbs against of the Ottomans in 1279. Just because the majority of their population is Albanian does not mean they have the right to just leave, especially a region of that importance and culture, which will likely be removed by the Albanians. The only reason there are so many albanians there is because the albanians as a race and a country have the highest birthrate in the world , and serbs where massacred and deported in the 2 days and NATO covered up the atrocities committed against Serbian civilians to justify their devastating bombing campaign over civilian targets in Serbian cities in their area bombing campaign.
What would have happened if the Serbs won the battle of Maritsa?
What happened at the battle of MaritsaThe battle of Maritsa was a successful campaign by an outnumbered Ottoman garrison which won due to the bad commanding by King Vukašin Mrnjavčević and his brother Despot Jovan UglješkaHad Mrnjavčević's forcces been better positioned or not so easy ambushed ( less then 100 guards & on low ground flanked by 3 high points ) , the Serbs could have won the battle .. Furthermore his forces are estimated to number around 60,000 , opposing a mere 800 Ottomans . In the initial ambush Mrnjavčević was killed , so 2nd in command Jovan Uglješka ordered his troops not to fight but to charge over the river abandoning all but a weapon per person , Over 20,000 drowned , and a 25,000 Serbs was killed in the battle . After the failure , around 2 thirds deserted , and the rest retreated . Those who stayed joined onto the forces of King Lazar of Serbia , and would fight at the battle of Kosovo .How the Serbs could've won the battle of MaritsaThere are many ways that the Serbs could've won the battle of Maritsa . One would be for the 60,000 troops to stay and fight the 800 Ottomans . This would result in a casualty rate of around 1 Ottoman death : 5 Serbian deaths , but this would not only mean victory but a significantly lower casualty rate .Another way would've been more guards patrolling , which would have inevitably intercepted the Ottomans and woken the army .There are many other ways to ensure a Serbian victory also .what would've happened if the Serbs won .Had the Serbians achieved victory at the battle of Maritsa , it would not be known as a significant battle but an extremely overrated failed Ottoman raid . Mrnjavčević's aim was to recapture Adrianople , and to get revenge for the Ottoman surprise attack at the battle of Sırp Sındığı , in which the Ottomans captured Thrace and blockaded Constantinople ( of the Byzantine Empire ) . Therefore , the bulk of the Ottoman forces would've engaged Mrnjavčević's army , and both sides would likely have taken heavy casualties . Had the Serbs also won this battle ( either side would have had about a 50 % chance of wining ) they would have captured Thrace , and that would be it for them . This would open the way for pro-byzantine crusades ( especially helped by Hungarians and Walichians ) , and the Ottoman Empire would fall . Mrnjavčević would continue on his original intentions after this , to capture Skoder . In later years , him and his ally Lazar the Serb would probably re-unite the Serbian Empire . The empire would conquer the small states in modern day norther Greece & possibly Bulgaria . They instead of the Ottomans would contend with Austria-Hungary over Bosnia/Croatia/Vojvodina . The Balkan wars wouldn't happen , the Russians would have uncontested control of the Caucasus and north-east turkey , Crimea would also be owned by the Russian Empire and the Crimean war would never happen . WW1 would still happen , because of the clashes between the West European powers , and the tensions between Serbia and Austria-Hungary & Germany and Russia would still exist . History out of the Balkans & black sea would remain the same until the build up to WW1 . The Serbian Empire would be easy to hold together as all ethic groups are south slavs with similar cultures , and the Serbs would be preferred by slavs over Austria-Hungary . The tensions and border disputes that the Balkans and Caucasus are famous for would not exist either . Russia , with no Ottoman Empire would be without contenders after the great northern war ( until Germany in the 19 hundreds ) . This would allow them to grow and modernise , and not be so was against Germany in WW1 , and there would be no February and October revolutions , and no Brest-Litovsk treaty . The central powers would suffer an even heavier defeat , and a Versailes treaty with an occupied Poland & Rhineland , some of or even all of Austria-hangary ( apart from Czechoslovakia ) occupied by Tsarist Russia , The Serbian Empire and Italy . Finland would not be independent & Japan would be able to run wild across Asia . China would be harder to take as without communism there would be no civil war . America wouldn't even be involved in a first world war with no Ottoman Empire and an overpowerfull Russia and Serbia . The wars quick success would prevent need for the league of nations and imperialism would continue , probably into the 21st century .If the Ottomans won , then history would go the same until the battle of Kosovo , in which the Ottomans would be significantly weaker . It is probably safe to say , that even if history in the Balkans went unchanged ( they still won at Kosovo & Varna ) , the Ottomans would be weaker and face problems due to this either in the caucasus , Crimean or North African conquests . The majority of history however , would remain unchanged .
What would have happened if the Serbs won the battle of maritsa .?
What happened at the battle of MaritsaThe battle of Maritsa was a successful campaign by an outnumbered Ottoman garrison which won due to the bad commanding by King Vukašin Mrnjavčević and his brother Despot Jovan UglješkaHad Mrnjavčević's forcces been better positioned or not so easy ambushed ( less then 100 guards & on low ground flanked by 3 high points ) , the Serbs could have won the battle .. Furthermore his forces are estimated to number around 60,000 , opposing a mere 800 Ottomans . In the initial ambush Mrnjavčević was killed , so 2nd in command Jovan Uglješka ordered his troops not to fight but to charge over the river abandoning all but a weapon per person , Over 20,000 drowned , and a 25,000 Serbs was killed in the battle . After the failure , around 2 thirds deserted , and the rest retreated . Those who stayed joined onto the forces of King Lazar of Serbia , and would fight at the battle of Kosovo .How the Serbs could've won the battle of MaritsaThere are many ways that the Serbs could've won the battle of Maritsa . One would be for the 60,000 troops to stay and fight the 800 Ottomans . This would result in a casualty rate of around 1 Ottoman death : 5 Serbian deaths , but this would not only mean victory but a significantly lower casualty rate .Another way would've been more guards patrolling , which would have inevitably intercepted the Ottomans and woken the army .There are many other ways to ensure a Serbian victory also .what would've happened if the Serbs won .Had the Serbians achieved victory at the battle of Maritsa , it would not be known as a significant battle but an extremely overrated failed Ottoman raid . Mrnjavčević's aim was to recapture Adrianople , and to get revenge for the Ottoman surprise attack at the battle of Sırp Sındığı , in which the Ottomans captured Thrace and blockaded Constantinople ( of the Byzantine Empire ) . Therefore , the bulk of the Ottoman forces would've engaged Mrnjavčević's army , and both sides would likely have taken heavy casualties . Had the Serbs also won this battle ( either side would have had about a 50 % chance of wining ) they would have captured Thrace , and that would be it for them . This would open the way for pro-byzantine crusades ( especially helped by Hungarians and Walichians ) , and the Ottoman Empire would fall . Mrnjavčević would continue on his original intentions after this , to capture Skoder . In later years , him and his ally Lazar the Serb would probably re-unite the Serbian Empire . The empire would conquer the small states in modern day norther Greece & possibly Bulgaria . They instead of the Ottomans would contend with Austria-Hungary over Bosnia/Croatia/Vojvodina . The Balkan wars wouldn't happen , the Russians would have uncontested control of the Caucasus and north-east turkey , Crimea would also be owned by the Russian Empire and the Crimean war would never happen . WW1 would still happen , because of the clashes between the West European powers , and the tensions between Serbia and Austria-Hungary & Germany and Russia would still exist . History out of the Balkans & black sea would remain the same until the build up to WW1 . The Serbian Empire would be easy to hold together as all ethic groups are south slavs with similar cultures , and the Serbs would be preferred by slavs over Austria-Hungary . The tensions and border disputes that the Balkans and Caucasus are famous for would not exist either . Russia , with no Ottoman Empire would be without contenders after the great northern war ( until Germany in the 19 hundreds ) . This would allow them to grow and modernise , and not be so was against Germany in WW1 , and there would be no February and October revolutions , and no Brest-Litovsk treaty . The central powers would suffer an even heavier defeat , and a Versailes treaty with an occupied Poland & Rhineland , some of or even all of Austria-hangary ( apart from Czechoslovakia ) occupied by Tsarist Russia , The Serbian Empire and Italy . Finland would not be independent & Japan would be able to run wild across Asia . China would be harder to take as without communism there would be no civil war . America wouldn't even be involved in a first world war with no Ottoman Empire and an overpowerfull Russia and Serbia . The wars quick success would prevent need for the league of nations and Imperialism would continue , probably into the 21st century .If the Ottomans won , then history would go the same until the battle of Kosovo , in which the Ottomans would be significantly weaker . It is probably safe to say , that even if history in the Balkans went unchanged ( they still won at Kosovo & Varna ) , the Ottomans would be weaker and face problems due to this either in the caucasus , Crimean or North African conquests . The majority of history however , would remain unchanged .
