0
The cherokee
What else can I help you with?
How did president Jackson react to the supreme court removal on the Indian removal act?
Jackson refused to obey the court's ruling
How did the Indian removal act of 1830 go against the Worchester versus Georgia?
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 contradicts the Supreme Court's ruling in Worcester v. Georgia (1832), which affirmed that Native American nations were sovereign entities and that states could not impose their laws on them. In this case, the Court ruled that Georgia's laws extending into Cherokee territory were unconstitutional. However, the federal government proceeded with the Indian Removal Act, forcibly relocating thousands of Native Americans, effectively disregarding the Court's decision and undermining the rights of Native American tribes. This highlighted the tension between federal authority and judicial rulings in the context of Native American sovereignty.
How did President Jackson respond to the Supreme Court's decision in the Indian removal act?
Jackson refused to obey the court's ruling
The Cherokees were supported in their unsuccessful battle against removal by?
The Cherokees were supported in their unsuccessful battle against removal by various allies, including sympathetic white settlers, abolitionists, and some religious groups who opposed the forced relocation. Legal advocates, most notably the attorney and future Supreme Court Justice William Henry Harrison, argued their case in court, highlighting their rights and sovereignty. Additionally, the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in cases like Worcester v. Georgia provided some legal backing, though ultimately, the government proceeded with the Indian Removal Act, leading to the tragic Trail of Tears.
Who John Marshall and what ruling did he make about the Indian removal act?
John Marshall was the fourth Chief Justice of the United States, serving from 1801 to 1835. He is known for establishing the principle of judicial review and for his influential rulings that strengthened the power of the Supreme Court. In the case of Worcester v. Georgia (1832), Marshall ruled that the state of Georgia could not impose its laws on Native American lands, affirming the sovereignty of Native American nations. However, despite this ruling, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was still implemented, leading to the forced removal of many Native Americans from their ancestral lands.
How did president Jackson react to the supreme court removal on the Indian removal act?
Jackson refused to obey the court's ruling
How did president Jackson react to the supreme court on the Indian removal act?
Jackson refused to obey the court's ruling
How did the Indian removal act of 1830 go against the Worchester versus Georgia?
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 contradicts the Supreme Court's ruling in Worcester v. Georgia (1832), which affirmed that Native American nations were sovereign entities and that states could not impose their laws on them. In this case, the Court ruled that Georgia's laws extending into Cherokee territory were unconstitutional. However, the federal government proceeded with the Indian Removal Act, forcibly relocating thousands of Native Americans, effectively disregarding the Court's decision and undermining the rights of Native American tribes. This highlighted the tension between federal authority and judicial rulings in the context of Native American sovereignty.
Why did treatment of Cherokee get worse after the Court declared Georgia's Indian removal laws to be unconstitutional?
The federal government did not enforce the Court's decisions.
The Supreme Court says Georgia Indian laws are unconstitutional. Cherokee fight for the US in the War of 1812. Jackson supports the Indian Removal Act with force.?
1. Cherokee fight for the United States in the War of 18122. The Supreme Court says Georgia Indian laws are unconstitutional3. Jackson supp0rts the Indian Removal Act with force(Apex)
What court case dealt with the Cherokee's attemt to fight the Indian Removal Act?
Cherokee Nation vs. Georgia
Why did treatment of Cherokee get a worse after the supreme court declared Georgia's Indian removal laws to be unconstitutional?
The federal government
How did President Jackson respond to the Supreme Court's decision in the Indian removal act?
Jackson refused to obey the court's ruling
The Cherokees were supported in their unsuccessful battle against removal by?
The Cherokees were supported in their unsuccessful battle against removal by various allies, including sympathetic white settlers, abolitionists, and some religious groups who opposed the forced relocation. Legal advocates, most notably the attorney and future Supreme Court Justice William Henry Harrison, argued their case in court, highlighting their rights and sovereignty. Additionally, the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in cases like Worcester v. Georgia provided some legal backing, though ultimately, the government proceeded with the Indian Removal Act, leading to the tragic Trail of Tears.
How did Andrew Jackson respond to the supreme courts decision which declared georgics Indian removal laws unconstitutional?
He ignored the Court's ruling (Apex)
How did Andrew Jackson respond to the Supreme Court decision that declared Georgia's Indian removal laws unconstitutional?
He ignored the Court's ruling (Apex)
Who was in a better position to battle for control of its interests in the french and Indian war?
the french because they had home court advantage.
