0
What else can I help you with?
How did the views of Jefferson and Hamilton differ in relation to the Constitutionality of banks?
In general, the views of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton on the application of the Constitution were quite different. In The Bank Debate, the Constitutionality of banks were argued. Jefferson believed in Strict Construction, meaning that if the Constitution didn't directly say something, then they couldn't do it, such as banks, which were not included in the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton, on the other hand, believed in Loose Construction, which meant that if the Constitution doesn't say they can't do something, they can. So to Hamilton, banks were Constitutional because they weren't mentioned in the Constitution; for Jefferson banks were unconstitutional for the same reason.
What is the relation between the Declaration and the Constitution?
The Declaration outlines what a government should entail and what its duties are. It contributes that as human beings we have inalienable rights, and roughly mentions what they are. The Constitution sets these legal rights in writing and specifies exactly what they include.
Which of these agencies administers federal labor management relation laws?
The Department of Labor is responsible for the management of labor relations laws. The department enforces labor laws enacted by Congress.
What was the argument of John C Calhoun's Fort Hill Address?
In his Fort Hill Address delivered in 1831, John C. Calhoun argued for the principle of states' rights and the protection of minority interests against the potential tyranny of the majority. He emphasized that the federal government should not infringe upon the rights of states, advocating for a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Calhoun also expressed concerns about the growing power of the central government and the need for a constitutional safeguard to prevent oppression of minority factions, particularly in relation to the issue of slavery.
What was Maximilien Robespierre's relation to Napoleon Bonaparte?
No relation whatsoever
The Doctrine of affirms that a bill is consitutional if it has an obvious relation to the powers granted to Congress by the Constitution?
The Doctrine of __ affirms that a bill is consitutional if it has an obvious relation to the powers granted to Congress by the Constitution.
What is the role of the congress the president and the supreme court in relation to making laws?
Under the Constitution, it is the power of Congress, and Congress only to make laws. It is then up to the President to sign them into law, or veto them. The Supreme Court takes up matter that need clarification as to whether or not they are allowed and legal under the Constitution.
What is constitutional law?
A constitutional government is any government whose authority and construction are defined by a constitution. The government need not be of a specific type, such as democratic, socialist, etc., but it does need to have parameters that are defined and relatively unchangeable.
How did the doctrine of nonalignment influence the relation of India and Pakistan with the cold war superpower?
The doctrine in question influenced the relation of India and Pakistan by freeing up armed forces. The doctrine assisted the following countries: Africa and Asia.
What power does Congress have in relation to war?
In relation to war, Congress has the power to declare war. They also have the power to control the funding of the war.
What is Archipelagic Doctrine?
The Archipelagic Doctrine is a legal concept that defines archipelagic states as those consisting of groups of islands and adjacent waters forming an intrinsic geographical, economic, and political entity. It establishes the rights, duties, and limits of archipelagic states in relation to their archipelagic waters. The doctrine was first introduced by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in 1982.
What limitations are placed on Congress in terms of its powers and authority, specifically in relation to what it cannot do?
Congress is limited in its powers and authority by the Constitution, which outlines specific things it cannot do. For example, Congress cannot pass ex post facto laws, suspend the writ of habeas corpus, or grant titles of nobility. These limitations help ensure a balance of power and protect individual rights.
What is the difference between the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine and the exclusionary rule in relation to evidence obtained illegally?
The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine states that evidence obtained illegally or unconstitutionally cannot be used in court, along with any other evidence that stems from it. The exclusionary rule, on the other hand, is a legal principle that prohibits evidence obtained in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights from being used in court.
What are the two 3rd century positions that theologians in the early church had to struggle against in relation to the doctrine of the Godhead?
Arianism
What does necessary and proper do?
The Necessary and Proper Clause is also known as the Elastic Clause the Sweeping Clause. It is a clause in the first Article of the US Constitution. It states that the Congress will have the power to make Laws that shall be necessary and proper in relation to execution of the power.
What has the author Martin Arnold Roberts written?
Martin Arnold Roberts has written: 'The annex of the Library of Congress' -- subject(s): Library of Congress 'The Library of Congress in relation to research' -- subject(s): Library of Congress
Which type of law focuses mostly on the rights of individuals in relation to both federal and state governments?
constitutional law
