It is written in Art II Sec 3 that Civilian authority is at all times supreme over the military. Martial law also aims in protecting the people, it doesn't necessarily mean that they are supreme over the civilians during this time.
Martial Law .
Martial Law
Martial law is law enforcement by the military on a civilian population at times of emergency. Military law is a special kind of law code which military personnel become subject to when they enlist in the military. It would normally be enforced by the military police and courts Marshal. Military law does not normally apply to non enlisted personnel.
Civilian law is typically always in place. Military law is only invoked in extreme emergencies. However, military personnel are always subject to military law. The Adjutant General will negotiate with the civilian authorities if there is any situation where it is not definite as to which takes precedence. Actually, in the United States, no military person (or, for that matter, anyone other than the Judical Branch) can arbitrarily decide to enforce military law in a place where it is not currently in place. Not even the President can decide to apply military law in a place where civil law is currently in force (indeed, this is one of the major contentious issues around the classification of terrorists as "enemy combatants", and the legality of this move is still being subject to litigation). The misnowmer "martial law" does not actually apply Military Law, but rather enforce a certain subsection of civilian law. For instance, let's say that there is major rioting in a city, and the National Guard is called in to restore order, and "martial law" is declared by the city's major (or perhaps, the state governor). Members of the National Guard are subject to Military law, and any infractions they commit will naturally be covered by military trial. HOWEVER, should a National Guardsman capture a looter (or other criminal), they are then prosecuted under CIVILIAN LAW, even though "martial law" was declared. Martial law in this case is a specific subsection of civilian law, which criminalizes certain activities which are normally permissible under ordinary civilian law. Back to the original question: as Congress is the creator of both military and civilian law, it can decide whether civilian or military law applies in a situation where the military normally has first jurisdiction. There are a myriad number of places this can occur, so naming them all is not possible. In addition, the Constitution is still the highest law of the land, and is supreme over both military and civilian law. Do note that many crimes are not covered by military law, but only civilian law, so it is entirely possible for a person normally subject to military jurisdiction to be prosecuted by civilian authorities without military acquiecence. For example, Insider Trading is a civilian crime, with no military equivalent, so it would be entirely possible to charge a military serviceperson on a military base with this civilian crime.
Military personnel in jail are subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and may face disciplinary actions, court-martial proceedings, or administrative discharge. They may also be subject to the rules and regulations of the civilian jail facility where they are held.
Martial Law .
Martial Law
If a civilian is on a military installation the governing authority would be the Military Police and yes you can be arrested by the Military Police until transport by the Civilian Law can pick you up and await charges or court by the civilian authority. Now off a military installation a Military Policeman can not arrest a civilian unless martial law has been imposed by congress.
It's enforced by the military, but may be imposed under civil rule. Its particular terms may be determined by the military or by a civilian administration.
A court martial is simply a military court. There is no such thing as a mid-term in a military court any more than there is in a civilian court.
Civilian law and military are very unalike. Unless the civilian lawyer is skilled and practiced at military law, I would go with the military counsel every time.
When the military takes control of a civilian government it's called martial law. This happened in the recent past of Egypt, as one example. When this happens, normal government activities such as holding elections and other personal freedoms by a population are usually suspended.
Martial law in Filipino is "batas militar." It refers to a state of law where military forces have increased authority and control over civilian activities, usually declared by the government in times of emergency or unrest to maintain order and security.
Courts martial are military courts. When soldiers commit crimes such as desertion of duty, collaboration with the enemy etc., they are not tried in civilian courts, they are tried in special military courts, under military rules.
Courts martial are military courts. When soldiers commit crimes such as desertion of duty, collaboration with the enemy etc., they are not tried in civilian courts, they are tried in special military courts, under military rules.
The plural of court-martial is courts-martial, a system of judicial process used by the military to try certain criminal and disciplinary offenses, as well as cases where military rules and principals have been violated. U.S. courts-martial closely follow civilian procedures, and the accused may request to be tried by a military judge alone or by a jury.
Martial Law