answersLogoWhite

0

The second argument which was against the ESA. It was written by Peyton knight he had a lot of statistics and numbers in his argument and the other guy Bob Davison just talked about what a good program it is and how it is helping. He wasn't as specific.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What are the main arguments against healthy eating?

junk food tastes better. Commercial companies have limited opportunities to make money from, say, fruit and vegetables so will always advertise products that are more lucrative and probably more unhealthy.


Which of Frederick Douglass arguments for marking the abolition of slavery an aim of the war do you find most convincing?

The 12th one because Peeta Mellarks bread taste soo good in that one.


What does Vanzetti claim to be better at than Sacco?

Vanzetti claims to be better at presenting their case in a more persuasive and compelling manner than Sacco. He believes that his ability to articulate their arguments and express their emotions is superior, which he thinks is crucial for garnering sympathy and support in their legal struggles. This self-assessment highlights Vanzetti's confidence in his rhetorical skills compared to Sacco's approach.


Could ancient roman gladiators leave a fight?

No, it would have been against the rules and more importantly against their oath.No, it would have been against the rules and more importantly against their oath.No, it would have been against the rules and more importantly against their oath.No, it would have been against the rules and more importantly against their oath.No, it would have been against the rules and more importantly against their oath.No, it would have been against the rules and more importantly against their oath.No, it would have been against the rules and more importantly against their oath.No, it would have been against the rules and more importantly against their oath.No, it would have been against the rules and more importantly against their oath.


What were Andrew Jacksons arguments for the removal of the native Americans to uninhabited lands?

more room for the amerian to settle

Related Questions

You find that there are compelling arguments for opposing arguments in response to your research question what can you do?

Incorporate the opposing arguments into your research to provide a more comprehensive analysis. Address the opposing arguments with counterarguments backed by evidence to strengthen your research. Acknowledge the validity of the opposing arguments while highlighting the strengths of your own research.


When there are compelling arguments for either side of an argument its more difficult to draw a conclusion In cases like these you can take one of two approaches Do more to try to break the?

research; argue more persuasively


When there are compelling arguments for either side of an argument it's more difficult to draw a conclusion In cases like these you can take one of two approaches do more to try to break the?

research; argue more persuasively


What are arguments for and against free range farming?

Free-Range for - Space to roam freely, organic, no pesticieds used, higher quality produce. Against- More expensive, and hard to find open space for it


Why are arguments important to public speaking?

Arguments are important in public speaking because they help to persuade and influence an audience by providing strong reasons and evidence to support a point of view. Well-structured arguments can enhance the credibility of the speaker and make the message more compelling and convincing to the audience. Additionally, arguments can help guide the audience's understanding and engagement with the speech by providing a logical flow of ideas.


What arguments could you offered for and against the removal for us to make room for new neighborhoods?

The arguments that you could offer against the removal of forests to make room for new neighborhoods include deforestation which effects the environment, climate change, and much more.


What are the Arguments for and against old people driving?

For: They are more experienced drivers. Against: They may not have had a test for a while so their driving skills may have changed for the worse.


What does the scripture say about engaging in arguments with fools?

The scripture advises against engaging in arguments with fools, as it can lead to more conflict and harm than good. It is better to avoid such debates and focus on wisdom and understanding instead.


What are three arguments against globalization?

One argument against globalization is that their is more disparity of wealth now. Other arguments against globalization are that the economics of other countries can affect America and countries can lose jobs when other countries will do the work for less.


Who has a stronger argument on same-sex marriage society or religion?

There is a lot of overlap between the two groups you mentioned: society and religion. I'll assume you mean secular society v. religious groups. The answer is that each side finds their own arguments more compelling. However, it is the secular arguments that hold up better in a court of law. Courts of law regularly reject arguments that are based solely on religious beliefs.


What are good arguments about domestic violence against men?

The same arguments that are used against women. The gender shouldn't change your argument. However, Arguments like the fact that people will take the topic lightly because the usually more submissive member * the female * is taking power over the dominant one * male * is a good way to start. Simplified : People overlook this because of gender roles.


What is rhetorical force in critical thinking?

Rhetorical force in critical thinking refers to the strategic and persuasive use of language to strengthen arguments and influence others' perspectives. It involves using logical reasoning, emotional appeals, and ethical appeals to make a compelling case. Rhetorical force can help critical thinkers present their ideas more effectively and increase the impact of their arguments.