C. A newspaper article attacking a presidential candidate written by the candidate's chief opponent
There is no credible evidence to suggest that George Washington Carver was a eunuch. Historical accounts and biographical information about him do not mention any such condition. Carver is primarily known for his contributions to agriculture and his work with peanuts and crop rotation, rather than details about his personal life or physical condition.
WikiAnswers is not a credible source. Credible means believable. Some examples: Diplomas hanging in my doctor's office show me that she is credible. A witness who does not come across to the jury as credible will not help the case. I didn't let the man into our home because his claim to be a police officer did not seem credible.
Jesus became the God's son and when he grew up he helped people just like god aparently does
Look through your sources for information you can use
because its not healthy and does not grow in the ground
Primary sources such as letters, diaries, and firsthand accounts from the time period are most likely to provide historians with credible information about a historical figure. These sources offer insights directly from the individual or people who knew them, making them valuable for understanding the person's life and impact.
The historian often has much more information than he, or she, can use in answering a historical question. He, or she, must sort that information into what is important in the progression of the story. Too much information is as bad as too little. Consider discarding any information that is not vital to telling the story, however, you may choose to include a few information snippets to make the story interesting and draw your reader into events. Asking and answering yourself questions can help in sorting information. Use only the most important and credible historical sources. Consider discarding information from secondary sources, rather than primary sources. If you have information from two sources, one a primary source and one a secondary source use the primary source information, you can always cite the secondary source as reference. The historian seeks to use sources to compile a logical narrative that leads to a credible reconstruction. Historical writing is exactly the same as any other writing, it needs to be clear, concise, and say the necessary in a brief, but complete way.
Credible is believable, based on information or fact.
Credible is believable, based on information or fact.
A historian may ask themselves the following questions to determine if a primary source is usable: Is the source contemporary to the events being studied? Is the author credible and knowledgeable about the subject matter? Is there bias or perspective that needs to be considered when interpreting the source?
Credible is believable, based on information or fact; not credible is not believable because it may be based on opinion, a biased source, and contain little actual information or fact.
Wikipedia can be credible if the editor cited beyond the page but if the information is not cited the information may or may not be correct.
Finding information from credible sources is important because it ensures the accuracy and reliability of the information. Credible sources are more likely to have undergone rigorous fact-checking and adhere to high standards of accuracy, giving you confidence in the information you are using. Additionally, using credible sources helps prevent the spread of misinformation or fake news.
"Credible" is defined as "Being believable, based on information, source or fact." - Something that is credible, is reliable, it's trustworthy.
Credible information refers to data, facts, or details that can be trusted as accurate, reliable, and trustworthy. It is information that has been researched, verified, and comes from a reputable source. Credible information is essential for making informed decisions and forming opinions based on reliable evidence.
No Marcus Garvey was not exactly gay, but he did help them out a bit when they were busy.
There is no credible evidence or factual basis to support the claim that George Bush sacrificed a boy. Such allegations are often rooted in conspiracy theories and misinformation. It's important to rely on verified information and credible sources when discussing historical figures and events.