0
As of now, no state has successfully withdrawn its ratification of a constitutional amendment. In the case of the Equal Rights Amendment, for instance, several states attempted to rescind their ratifications, but these efforts have been deemed ineffective by legal scholars and courts. The prevailing view is that once a state ratifies an amendment, that decision is final and cannot be retracted.
What else can I help you with?
What was the subject of the Louisiana laws upheld by Plessy v. Ferguson?
The subject of the Louisiana laws upheld by Plessy v. Ferguson was racial segregation on public transportation, specifically the "separate but equal" doctrine.
What were the three court cases that released the Japanese from internment camps?
The three key court cases that challenged Japanese internment during World War II were Hirabayashi v. United States (1943), Korematsu v. United States (1944), and Endo v. United States (1944). In Hirabayashi, the Supreme Court upheld curfews for Japanese Americans, while Korematsu upheld the constitutionality of internment. However, Endo ultimately ruled that the government could not detain loyal citizens, leading to the release of Japanese Americans from internment camps. This case marked a significant shift in the legal landscape regarding civil rights and government authority.
Why was Schenck vs US important?
Upheld the espinage act of 1917
What happened as a result of the Scopes Monkey trial?
The law prohibiting the teaching of evolution was upheld.
What was the only tax on the colonies upheld by Parliament after the Boston Massacre?
tea was the only tax
Which supreme court upheld the constitutionality of the second bank of the United states?
they had a baby
Why did Anti Federalists oppose ratification?
The Anti-Federalists were in favor of keeping the Articles of Confederation, perhaps with revisions, believing in the ultimate power of states over a central government such as what is upheld in a confederation. They feared that the Federalists' new government would be too similar to the harsh regimes of Europe which held great power and thus repressed the people. Anti-Feds were extremely scared of a strong central government and the fact that under the new Constitution, the federal government was more powerful than individual states. They believed this would encroach upon people's liberty.
What was the name of the court case that upheld the interment of Japanese?
Supreme Court Case Korematsu V. United States (1944)
What Supreme Court case upheld the constitutionality of the federal sentencing guidelines?
Mistretta v. United States
What famous Marshall decision upheld the doctrine of implied powers and proclaimed national supremacy over the states?
Marbury vs madison
Who upheld the decree by Darius that let the Jews rebuild their temple?
it was upheld by cyrus
What were precedents in Korematsu v US?
In Korematsu v. United States, the precedents included cases that addressed the balance between individual rights and national security, such as Schenck v. United States, which upheld limits on free speech during wartime. Additionally, the decision referenced cases like Hirabayashi v. United States, which upheld the curfews imposed on Japanese Americans. These precedents established a framework where wartime actions could infringe upon civil liberties if deemed necessary for national security, ultimately leading to the controversial ruling that upheld the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II.
What was the result of the scopes 'monkey trail'?
The law prohibiting the teaching of evolution was upheld
What law was upheld as constitutional in the supreme court case of schenck v. United states?
Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies
What upheld the rights of states to nullify a law?
The concept of states' rights to nullify federal laws is rooted in the principle of state sovereignty and the idea that the Constitution is a compact among states. This notion was notably articulated in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798, where Thomas Jefferson and James Madison argued that states could invalidate federal laws deemed unconstitutional. While the Supreme Court has generally upheld federal supremacy, the debates surrounding nullification have influenced discussions on states' rights throughout American history. Ultimately, the legal foundation for nullification remains contentious and is not widely accepted in contemporary jurisprudence.
Can a void contract be signed and upheld in court?
A void contract can be signed and upheld in court. However, this depends on why it was void to begin with.
Was The Supreme Court on several occasions has upheld automatic expatriation?
FALSE! The Supreme Court has never upheld automatic expatration.
