0
What else can I help you with?
What is the difference between the European and Japanese hierarchy?
Part of the difference lies in the fact that the Japanese hierarchy had a greater number of roles particularily for the peasants. Wherase the European peasants were not necessarily divided into actual roles, the Japanese were. As well the addition of a Shogun is different from any role preseted within European feudalism. Since within European feudalism the monarch would fufill both the role of the emperor and the shogun in one.
How is japanese feudalism different from european feudalism?
Japanese feudalism, which developed primarily from the 12th to the 19th century, was characterized by a strong warrior class known as the samurai, who served local lords (daimyos) and followed a strict code of honor called bushido. In contrast, European feudalism, which emerged in the early Middle Ages, was based on a system of land ownership and vassalage, where nobles granted land (fiefs) to vassals in exchange for military service and loyalty to a king or lord. Additionally, European feudalism was more hierarchical with a clear structure from monarchs down to serfs, while Japanese feudalism emphasized loyalty and personal relationships among samurai and their lords. Overall, both systems were decentralized, but their cultural values and social structures differed significantly.
How was Japanese feudalism different from European feudalism?
In Japan, merchants were not as well regarded, peasant farmers were more highly regarded and women were exacted to be stronger.
Compare European and Japanese feudalism?
Feudalism in Japan was between the years 1192 and 1868 whereas in Europe it started in 800 and ended by 1400. The nights of both parties were loyal due to legal contract. They followed strict ethical codes and spent their lifetime getting ready for war.
Could someone compare and contrast feudalism in medieval Europe with feudalism in Japan?
when feudal japan began it is told that they were isolated and they got that from the European feudalism. Both of there feudalisms were made for scurity and stability. Also both countries had a war, like Europe had to fight invadors and japan had to fight warlords. This was all power and welth they say. For these battles they protected themselves. After the win, pesants were looking up to there lord (land owner). !
How was Japanese feudalism similar to European feudalism?
Both the European and Japanese feudal systems developed as a result of a weak central government.
How was Japanese feundalism different from European fuendalism?
Feudalism in japan was similar to European feudalism as they both involved the same heirachy and therefore was quite simialr apart from the class definitions.
Did Japanese or European feudalism leave a more lasting Legacy explain?
Both Japanese and European feudalism left significant legacies, but they manifested differently. European feudalism laid the groundwork for modern nation-states and legal systems, influencing governance and social structures in the West. In contrast, Japanese feudalism created a unique cultural identity, deeply rooted in samurai ethics and bushido, which continues to shape Japanese society today. Ultimately, the lasting impact of each system is evident in their respective cultures, with European feudalism influencing political frameworks and Japanese feudalism preserving cultural traditions and values.
What were the similarities and differences between Japanese and European feudalism (framework)?
Both Japanese and European feudalism were hierarchical systems that structured society around land ownership and loyalty. In Japan, the samurai served the daimyo in exchange for land and protection, while in Europe, knights served lords under a similar feudal contract. However, a key difference lies in the cultural context: Japanese feudalism emphasized bushido, a code of honor for samurai, while European feudalism was more influenced by chivalric codes and the Christian Church. Additionally, Japanese feudalism was more centralized under the shogunate, whereas European feudalism was often fragmented among numerous competing lords.
What were similarities and differences between Japanese and European feudalism?
Both Japanese and European feudalism featured a hierarchical structure where land was exchanged for military service and loyalty. In Japan, the system was centered around samurai and their lords (daimyos), while in Europe, it involved knights and nobles. A key difference was that Japanese feudalism was more centralized under the shogunate, whereas European feudalism was often fragmented with overlapping allegiances. Additionally, cultural and social roles differed, with the samurai adhering to a strict code of honor (bushido) compared to the chivalric code of European knights.
What is the difference between the European and Japanese hierarchy?
Part of the difference lies in the fact that the Japanese hierarchy had a greater number of roles particularily for the peasants. Wherase the European peasants were not necessarily divided into actual roles, the Japanese were. As well the addition of a Shogun is different from any role preseted within European feudalism. Since within European feudalism the monarch would fufill both the role of the emperor and the shogun in one.
How are European feudalism and Japanese feudalism alike?
European and Japanese feudalism share similarities in their hierarchical social structures, where land ownership and loyalty were central to political and military organization. Both systems featured a network of lords and vassals, with lords granting land in exchange for military service and loyalty. Additionally, both societies emphasized a code of conduct—chivalry in Europe and bushido in Japan—that governed the behavior of their warriors. Ultimately, both systems were designed to maintain order and security in a time of political fragmentation.
How was the structure of Japanese feudalism similar to European feudilism?
Japanese feudalism and European feudalism both featured a hierarchical structure based on land ownership and loyalty. In Japan, land was controlled by powerful lords known as daimyo, who granted land to samurai in exchange for military service, similar to the European system where lords provided land (fiefs) to vassals for their allegiance. Both systems emphasized a code of honor—bushido in Japan and chivalry in Europe—governing the conduct of warriors. Ultimately, both feudal systems created a decentralized political structure reliant on local power dynamics.
How is japanese feudalism different from european feudalism?
Japanese feudalism, which developed primarily from the 12th to the 19th century, was characterized by a strong warrior class known as the samurai, who served local lords (daimyos) and followed a strict code of honor called bushido. In contrast, European feudalism, which emerged in the early Middle Ages, was based on a system of land ownership and vassalage, where nobles granted land (fiefs) to vassals in exchange for military service and loyalty to a king or lord. Additionally, European feudalism was more hierarchical with a clear structure from monarchs down to serfs, while Japanese feudalism emphasized loyalty and personal relationships among samurai and their lords. Overall, both systems were decentralized, but their cultural values and social structures differed significantly.
How was Japanese feudalism different from European feudalism?
In Japan, merchants were not as well regarded, peasant farmers were more highly regarded and women were exacted to be stronger.
How was Japanese feudalism the same from European feudalism?
Both were almost exactly the same. You must understand that Feudalism is really just a lord giving land to his nobles for military aid and loyalty. Both nations used the same system. Also both had small petty kingdoms that experienced constant warfare, as each noble ran his fief, or land, as a small nation. Also, Feudalism was also present in several other countries, including China. Today, some countries still use feudalism.
How were women treated differently in European and Japaneses feudalism?
In European feudalism, women often had limited rights and were primarily valued for their roles in marriage and motherhood, with legal and social status largely dependent on their male relatives. In contrast, Japanese feudalism allowed women more agency in certain areas, such as property ownership and family lineage, especially among the samurai class, where women could be involved in managing estates. However, both systems ultimately reinforced patriarchal structures, with women's roles often confined to domestic spheres. Overall, while Japanese women had some legal rights, both societies upheld strict gender norms that restricted women's freedoms.
