Both Mesopotamian and Harappan civilizations were advanced for their time, but they exhibited different characteristics of "civilization." Mesopotamia is often noted for its early development of writing, legal codes, and complex political structures, while the Harappan civilization is recognized for its sophisticated urban planning, drainage systems, and standardized weights and measures. Ultimately, the term "more civilized" can vary based on the criteria used; both civilizations excelled in different areas that contributed to their complexity and advancement.
a culuture
Well, Some mesopotamian's had more power's than the others, but no, no one was richer or more poor than the other's
largest civilized tribe
when the indus valley civilisation was unerthened lots of human skeleton was found at many places therefore it was also called harappan civilisation.
they where mad of more than 100000000 clay pieces.
Designed cities were characteristic of the Minoan, Mesopotamian, Harrapan, and ... it was rebuilt in a regular form that, according to tradition, was determined by .... many factors, not the least of which was the city's history of street revolutions.
a culuture
Because they were more CIVILIZED.
Act more like civilized people and less like animals.
Well, Some mesopotamian's had more power's than the others, but no, no one was richer or more poor than the other's
The Mesopotamian empire is made up of irrigation cuneiform artisans kings and more if this did not help you check out Google.
In the Indus River valley.
None
the president
No they weren't civilized!
Non-civilized societies typically have simpler social structures, limited technology, and rely on hunting and gathering for sustenance. In contrast, civilized societies have more complex social hierarchies, advanced technology, written language, and often rely on agriculture. Civilized societies also typically have developed forms of governance and infrastructure.
No. They are just more advanced technologically.