The noblemen elected the consuls. Usually they were white it was very rare for there to be a black man of nobility but to answer your question the mean of nobility and or citizens meaning all mean throughout Rome
The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.
ancient Rome
There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.
ancient Rome
You need to say what the following laws are.
The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.The senate in ancient Rome was a debating and consulting body. They could not actually pass a law (laws had to be voted on by the assemblies) but they could propose laws. They could also pass resolutions that for all practical purposes functioned as laws. In addition, treason or high profile criminal trials were tried by the senate.
ancient Rome
The ancient Romans did not have injury laws.
There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.
there were only twelve tables in ancient rome and they were Rome's written laws and were placed in the forum
It was called the Assembly. This meant, quite literally, an assembly of all of the people of Rome. They would debate matters and then vote by tribes with each tribe getting a certain number of votes based on its social standing. Many people believe, and indeed your textbook probably says, that the Roman Senate made the laws but this is inaccurate. The Senate could, and did, propose legislation and its proposals were almost always accepted but nonetheless only the assembly could actually enact a proposal and make it a law. Consuls and Tribunes could bypass the Senate and propose laws directly to the assembly which would then debate and vote on them.
ancient Rome
ancient Rome
You need to say what the following laws are.
Some of the early strengths of ancient Rome was its citizen military. Land owners in ancient Rome were recruited into the legions for the purpose of defending Rome. A citizen army has a large stake in the outcomes of battles and wars as their own families and their property were at stake. Another strength was ancient Rome's legal system. It made the Roman laws fair by having many of the key laws in writing. This made enforcing the laws by judges less subjective as unlike before all Romans could read the laws.
No. It was the other way around. The United States got its ideas from ancient Rome.
Yes. All the laws were important, that's why they were laws. The senate would not debate and propose a law and the assemblies would not vote on it if it were not important. Each law served a purpose and when that purpose was fulfilled, the law could be repealed as it had lost it relevancy.