0
Kharkiv Morozov Machine Building Design Bureau(Ukrainian: ХарківÑьке КонÑтрукторÑьке Бюро з ÐœÐ°ÑˆÐ¸Ð½Ð¾Ð±ÑƒÐ´ÑƒÐ²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ Ñ–Ð¼. О.О. Морозова, or ХКБМ, KhKBM), often simply called Morozov Design Bureau or abbreviated KMDB, is a state-owned company in Kharkiv, Ukraine, which designs armoured vehicles, including the T-80UD and T-84 main battle tanks, as well as military prime movers. It was responsible for many important Soviet AFVs, including the BT tank series and the T-34, T-54, and T-64 tanks. It is closely associated with the Malyshev Factory.
Source: Wikipedia
What else can I help you with?
M6 Super tank info.?
The M6 Heavy Assault Tank was a prototypical tank built in WWII. It was a designed on the base chassis of the failed T1 Heavy tank. It was armed with a 90mm M10 cannon, had 130mm armor, and the original T1 chassis. The M6 was designed in response to the rise of the new Tiger and Panther tanks. However, it was bulky and unwieldy, with a huge silhouette, and as such was unsuited for combating the Tiger tank. It was never designated as a Super Heavy tank. Aside from the M6HT, no other tank was designated with the name "M6".
What tanks were used in the Korean war?
US M4 & M26 Pershing & M46 Patton. The M46 was an upgraded M26. Both the M26 & M47 had 90mm main guns. The US also used the M24 Chaffee light tank. All but the M46 Patton were WWII left over tanks. The North Koreans used the Soviet T34 medium tank (also a left over from WWII).
What was the most effective tank in World War 2?
The tiger was a pretty effective tank surpassing all the other tanks in firepower and armour but it is an over engineered tank that was hard to produce in all only 1500 tiger tanks and unlike the allied Sherman and the Russian t-34 a destroyed tiger was very hard to replace. a T-34 had good mobility and firepower also it's sloped armour a radical design at the time deflected Incoming rounds to the side so it had good armour.also it was easy to produce,1300 t34 were produced every month and often drove right out of the factory door into the battle. So it was the most rebust and reliable and effective tank in WW2.
Was the German Maus better than the American T30 Tank?
The German Maus was a super-heavy tank that was designed for armored superiority, fielding a 128 mm gun. But it was impractically slow (8 mph). The Maus was never completed.The T30 was only finished after the end of World War II but could have inflicted damage on a Maus with its oversized 155 mm gun. The T30 had lighter armor but was considerably faster at up to 22 mph.The T30 today is considered a "tank destroyer" and the Maus was not the largest tank that Nazi Germany designed. The biggest tank was called the Ratte (Landkreuzer P. 1000 Ratte) , five times the weight of the Maus at over 1000 metric tons. This proposed Super Tank would have mounted twin 280mm naval guns, as well as adopting marine diesel engines for its motive power.
Can you provide information on the features and specifications of the Elke Tank"?
The Elke Tank is a durable and versatile water storage tank designed for residential and commercial use. It features a capacity of 1000 gallons and is made of high-quality polyethylene material, ensuring long-lasting performance. The tank is equipped with a 16-inch vented lid for easy access and maintenance. Additionally, it comes with a 2-inch outlet fitting for convenient water distribution. Overall, the Elke Tank is a reliable solution for storing and distributing water efficiently.
What the best tank in ww?
Russian T34
Who invented the t-34 war tank?
The T34 was an improved tank, designed by Mikhail Koshkin based upon the combat experience of the Soviet BT tanks during the Nomanhan battles in 1939 with Japan.
Which car has the least mile per gallon ratio?
T34 tank 6 gallons to the mile
What tank did the Russians build?
The father of one of histories most famous tanks, the T34, was the BT tanks. If it hadn't been for the BT tank and it's combat experience in 1939 at Nomonhan, the T34 would never have been born. And if it had been created at all, it would have been too late to participate in WWII. The BT stood for "fast tank" and in 1935 was probably the fastest and deadliest armed tank in the world with a high velocity 45mm tank gun. It's only weakness was it's gas engine, a fault that was corrected with it's son, the T34.
Which Soviet tank had to raise its gun to reload?
In modern times, the t80 and t90 both require its barrel lifted the t34 also required it
Diesel engine what engine in t34 tank?
" Due to a shortage of new V-2 diesel engines, the initial production run from the Gorky factory were equipped with the BT tank's Mikulin M-17 gasoline aircraft engine, and inferior transmission and clutch." Wikipedia
What was the biggest tank used in world war 2?
The T34 Russian Tank was the most formidable and largest tank. At least it was the most deadly tank. You can read about tanks on the link below.The Allied made "Land Ship". It was so big and heavily armored that it would go only 3 mph, gigantic targets for artillery, and would get stuck in the mud.
Who designed the Churchill tank?
England
What was the name of the American tank in World War 2?
Technically speaking, there were actually many tanks that have participated in WW II. For example, there was a super heavy tank called the T28 equipped with the 120 mm gun, built to counter other super heavy tanks such as the German tank Maus. Another USA tank was the T29. The T29 also had "brothers and sisters". The T29 is a prototype heavy tank designed with the 105 mm. It was made along with 2 other prototypes called the T30 and the T34. The last tank made was the T32. The T32 was the real deal. There is also another USA tank called the M10 Wolverine. There are many many more USA tanks but I'm not sure when they were made.
Was the Russian T34 tank superior to the German product in any aspects other than extremely cold conditions?
Yes. It had sloped armor, something German tanks had not employed up to that point. In addition, it had wide tracks, which gave it better traction in the conditions prevalent in Russia. Next, it was more reliable than the German tanks. The problems in comparison to German tanks were that the Soviet crews were not as well trained as their German adversaries. In addition, the Germans employed a crew of 5, whereas the Soviets usually had only 4. This made a big difference in that the Germans had an extra set of eyes looking for an enemy. And last but probably the most important, the T-34 was mass producable. The huge numbers churned out by the Soviet factories made up for any difference. Tank vs. tank, the Panther (after it's teething problems were resolved) was better. But as a class of tanks, the T-34 was arguably the best tank in WWII. There were actually two models of the T34, and the above answer refers to the tank known in the West as the T34/76 because of its 76mm gun mounted in a 2-man turret. The commander doubled as loader for the main weapon, and he had no cupola to give him all-around vision. The T34/85 introduced in 1943 corrected these faults simply by mounting an 85mm gun in a larger 3-man turret with a cupola. The third man merely loaded the main weapon, leaving the commander nothing to do except to command with the benefit of all-around vision. The only penalties were slightly higher sihlouette and extra weight, but these were small prices to pay for the best tank of World War II. As well-stated by the above answer, the German Panther was still superior on a one-to-one basis, but it was offset by the fact that the Panther was expensive and could be produced in fewer numbers, while the T34 could be produced more cheaply and easily. Both models of the T34 were uncomfortable and hard on their crews, but the Soviet Army wanted a tank that could fight, nothing more. A tank is a combination of three things: firepower, protection, and mobility. The sloped armor, wide tracks, and powerful gun of the T34/85 were the best combination of these three elements in WWII; even better than the original T34/76 which came as a demoralizing shock to the invading Germans. It was not the best in any one area, but it was the best compromise of all three areas. On a tank vs. tank basis, it might be noted that the T34 was superior to to the American Sherman in all three areas, but American wealth allowed the Sherman to be produced in even greater numbers, and the Sherman was much more comfortable for its 5-man crews.
What type of bulk material with the tank designed to carry that material?
The tank is designed to carry liquid bulk materials, such as chemicals, oils, fuels, and liquids.
Who was the first battle tank designed by?
British 1916
