A british soldier did not die.
A lot of people think that colonist were defenless but the truth is that the colnist had these big sticks and would hit the soldiers with them.
someone in the crowd yelled fire u *****
and the soldiers go on the command of fire
so they heard fire and BAM
but really the soldiers were innocent, its the colonist that wern't
No, the colonists did not throw clam shells at the British during the Boston Massacre. The event, which took place on March 5, 1770, involved a confrontation between British soldiers and a crowd of colonists who were protesting British rule. The protesters were throwing snowballs and other objects, but clam shells were not specifically mentioned as part of the incident. The clash escalated and resulted in British soldiers firing into the crowd, killing several colonists.
The soldiers did not eat anything during the so-called massacre. It was begun and done too fast for anything but firing of weapons.
The soldiers were in Boston because of the Quartering Act which states that British soldiers will stay in colonists house. The colonists must give the soldiers food, clothes, materials, a bed, a room, and other things. This enraged the colonists. The soldiers would give in return protection from other countries or the Indians from the French and Indian War.
The Boston Massacre was not a war, and it did not happen during a war. The Boston Massacre was a confrontation between a rowdy mob of people in Boston and a small detachment of British troops. Five civilians eventually died of wounds received during the event.
An inaccurate statement about the Boston Massacre is that it was a premeditated attack by British soldiers on unarmed civilians. In reality, the incident occurred on March 5, 1770, during a confrontation between British troops and colonists, which escalated into violence. The soldiers acted in self-defense after being provoked by the crowd, leading to the tragic shooting that resulted in the deaths of five colonists.
They ran away.
Captain Preston
The Patriots were attempting to demonstrate against British taxation, and the soldiers were there to maintain order.
John Adams
John Adams was a lawyer for the British soldiers during the Boston Massacre but soon joined the war efforts.
The British taxes on goods created hard feelings between the British and colonists. British soldiers panicked during a protest and caused the Boston Massacre. The British repealed all taxes except the one on tea in an effort to prove to the colonists that they had the power to tax the colonies. The colonists protested and caused the Boston Tea Party.
Yes they did during the Boston Massacre. The colonists did that because the soldier that killed a colonist because of an argument.
The soldiers did not eat anything during the so-called massacre. It was begun and done too fast for anything but firing of weapons.
The soldiers were in Boston because of the Quartering Act which states that British soldiers will stay in colonists house. The colonists must give the soldiers food, clothes, materials, a bed, a room, and other things. This enraged the colonists. The soldiers would give in return protection from other countries or the Indians from the French and Indian War.
The Boston Massacre was not a war, and it did not happen during a war. The Boston Massacre was a confrontation between a rowdy mob of people in Boston and a small detachment of British troops. Five civilians eventually died of wounds received during the event.
in between the angry crowd of colonists and his soldiers.
An inaccurate statement about the Boston Massacre is that it was a premeditated attack by British soldiers on unarmed civilians. In reality, the incident occurred on March 5, 1770, during a confrontation between British troops and colonists, which escalated into violence. The soldiers acted in self-defense after being provoked by the crowd, leading to the tragic shooting that resulted in the deaths of five colonists.