magna carta
The feudal arrangement can be compared to a contract today in that both involve a mutual agreement where parties have defined roles and responsibilities. In feudalism, lords granted land and protection to vassals in exchange for loyalty and service, resembling a contractual relationship where each party benefits from the other's obligations. However, modern contracts are typically more formalized, legally binding documents with clear terms and conditions, whereas feudal agreements were often based on personal loyalty and social hierarchy rather than written law. Additionally, contemporary contracts offer more legal recourse and protections for all involved parties.
There is no way to know the answer to this. Things like this require something written because they would have written to someone about how they felt. Since no one could read or write historians don't have this for secondary information. I would imagine it was the taxes. They were heavily taxed and even had to pay a tax at death.
In ancient times, an agreement often referred to a formal understanding or contract between parties, typically involving trade, alliances, or legal obligations. Such agreements were usually documented through written records, oral promises, or symbolic gestures, often witnessed by third parties or deities to ensure adherence. They were essential for establishing trust and cooperation in societies where formal legal systems were still developing. These agreements could encompass various aspects of life, including marriage, land ownership, and treaties between states.
a sound is sounded and a letter is written
Spoken:Charecter with speech bubbles saying stuff Written two characters passing notes (show what is written)
it wasn't a who , it was magna carta, a feudal document.
Pablo Oro has written: 'Contracts and obligations' -- subject(s): Contracts, Obligations (Law)
Sylvain Randrianahinoro has written: 'Droit des obligations' -- subject(s): Obligations (Law)
Alex Weill has written: 'Droit civil, les obligations' -- subject(s): Obligations (Law)
Monica D. Fournier has written: 'Perspectives on pattern recognition' -- subject(s): Pattern recognition, Pattern recognition systems
Jac Rinkes has written: 'Contractual and non-contractual obligations in English law' -- subject(s): Contracts, Obligations (Law)
W. B. Lawrence has written: 'International obligations of the United States' -- subject(s): International obligations, Foreign relations
Giovanni E. Longo has written: 'Ricerche sull'\\' -- subject(s): Natural obligations, Natural obligations (Roman law)
L. Rosser has written: 'Recognition in heaven' -- subject(s): Heavenly recognition 'Recognition in heaven' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Heavenly recognition 'Reply to Evils of infant baptism' -- subject(s): Infant baptism
Dijon Deverell has written: 'Recognition'
Yes, oral or written agreements are contractual obligations.
Anne S. McCarthy has written: 'Recognition technologies and users' needs' -- subject(s): Optical character recognition devices, Optical character recognition device industry, Purchasing