In the context of the historical Three Estates system, which categorized society into the clergy (First Estate), nobility (Second Estate), and commoners (Third Estate), the nobility typically held the most power. They had significant political influence, wealth, and control over land, often dominating the monarchy and government. However, the commoners, particularly during the lead-up to the French Revolution, began to challenge this power dynamic, leading to shifts in authority. Ultimately, the balance of power varied over time and context, particularly during periods of social and political upheaval.
In the pre-Revolution system, the first two estates, which made up 3% of the population had all the power. If that changed, they'd lose power.
The monarch had the power to make or change laws, to collect some kinds of taxes and estates.
A Lord was a "Landlord" and he had power over his manor/estates, but owed his power to the king. The king had the ultimate power.
clergy,nobility,peasants
If you're talking about the French Revolution and the Storming of the Bastille, it showed the 1st and 2nd estates that the power really does lie with the masses - the 3rd estate. It also showed the 3rd estate that the power lies with them. Not only did it show the 3 estates where the power was held, but it caused the brilliant Louis XVI to bring 18000 troops to Versailles, causing the Great Fear and the Second Revolution
In the pre-Revolution system, the first two estates, which made up 3% of the population had all the power. If that changed, they'd lose power.
The first and second estates detested the French revolution as it threatened to remove them from power and wealth.
goal of first estate was to maintain status quo, not be taxed and gain more power. That of second estate was same. That of third was to get greater power and require other 2 estates to pay taxes
The Estates general (Etats-Generaux) IS the 3 Estates (Clergy, Nobility, Commons) taken as a whole.
By calling the Estates-General Louis the XIV would be at a disadvantage because it would give more power to the 1st Estate and the 2nd Estate. He would be losing power and he had no reason to call on the Estates-General. Louis the XVIII had to call on the Estates-General because the country was about to go bankrupt and he had no other choice but to call on the Estates-General and ask them for a loan.
Normally estates
The monarch had the power to make or change laws, to collect some kinds of taxes and estates.
A Lord was a "Landlord" and he had power over his manor/estates, but owed his power to the king. The king had the ultimate power.
clergy,nobility,peasants
The Estates-General or States General was established in 1302 in France by Phillip the Fair. Its purpose was to get control of the clergy and get around the power of the nobility.
Yes. In some parts of the UK, wind generators power small industrial estates.
Kings were afraid that the nobles would be able to overthrow the king, if they were given the power of an Estates General.