The shift of power from nobles to commoners was significantly influenced by events such as the rise of the middle class during the Renaissance and the Industrial Revolution, as well as social movements like the French Revolution. Key figures, such as Enlightenment thinkers like john Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, promoted ideas of individual rights and democracy, which empowered common people. Additionally, the expansion of education and literacy played a crucial role in enabling commoners to challenge noble authority and advocate for their rights.
it helped shift the power to the pesants and make a democrocy
The hundred years' war weakened the feudal system because it helped shift power from lords to monarchs to commoners. Knights and castles were less useful because gunpowder and longbows were invented. Also a new feeling of nationalism shifted power away from lords
They led to a shift in power from feudal lords to common people and monarchs.
During the A.D. 800s, this shift of power from kings to nobles led to new order known as feudalism. Under feudalism, landowning nobles governed and also protected the people in return for services,such as fighting in a noble's army or farming the lands.
Louis XIV's palace at Versailles significantly diminished the power of French nobles by centralizing authority and creating a spectacle of royal grandeur that drew nobles to the court. By requiring them to spend time at Versailles, he kept them occupied with courtly life, thus reducing their influence in their own regions. Additionally, the elaborate rituals and hierarchy at Versailles emphasized the king's absolute power, making the nobles more dependent on his favor for status and privileges. This shift effectively reinforced the monarchy's dominance over the nobility in France.
it helped shift the power to the pesants and make a democrocy
The government began to run out of money. It also began to lose control over large landholders. As the central government grew weaker, noble families gained power.Hope this helped._. From:<<>>Lov is blood<<>>
The hundred years' war weakened the feudal system because it helped shift power from lords to monarchs to commoners. Knights and castles were less useful because gunpowder and longbows were invented. Also a new feeling of nationalism shifted power away from lords
They led to a shift in power from feudal lords to common people and monarchs.
When Edward I called together nobles and lesser subjects in 1295 to discuss the war, it marked the beginning of the Model Parliament, which included a broader representation of society in governance. This assembly allowed for greater input from commoners and lesser nobles, helping to legitimize royal decisions and secure support for military campaigns. It also signaled a shift towards a more participatory form of governance, laying the groundwork for the eventual development of parliamentary democracy in England. Ultimately, this gathering helped Edward secure necessary funds and troops for his military endeavors.
when the king went all the way from the top of the food chain, all the way to the bottom when the nobles came and took over.
Sift in power from nobles to common people: fewer people could demand for more money and rights.Many serfs abandoned feudal manors.Serfs had more freedom of choice
it helped shift the power to the pesants and make a democrocy
it helped shift the power to the pesants and make a democrocy
During the A.D. 800s, this shift of power from kings to nobles led to new order known as feudalism. Under feudalism, landowning nobles governed and also protected the people in return for services,such as fighting in a noble's army or farming the lands.
The Nobles' Renaissance, often referred to as the Renaissance of the Nobility, was a period during the late Middle Ages and early modern era when the European aristocracy experienced a cultural and intellectual revival. This movement was characterized by a renewed interest in classical art, literature, and philosophy, influenced by the broader Renaissance occurring in society. Nobles began to patronize the arts, leading to significant advancements in architecture, painting, and scholarship, which helped to shape the cultural landscape of Europe. Additionally, this period saw a shift in power dynamics as some nobles sought to increase their influence through education and cultural engagement.
Flavius is particularly drawn to the fact that the commoners, despite their lower social status, display a passionate enthusiasm for the events surrounding Julius Caesar. Their ability to shift their loyalties and sentiments so readily highlights the fickle nature of public opinion, which intrigues Flavius. This observation reflects the broader themes of power and influence in the play, as he recognizes that the commoners can be easily swayed, posing a potential threat to the stability of the political order.