Follow me on twitter @sinistersymistr
Mali, Ghana, Songhai, Kush and Axum.
Hinduism had no founder so it was not founded. It has always existed.
Genghis Khan. However this is up for debate as some may consider Julius Caesar a greater conqueror, or Napoleon, or Alexander. However those other Conquerors had already a powerful army at their disposal, and were technologically equal or better than the nations/peoples they conquered. Furthermore they had their nation more or less unified, except for Caesar, who had to fight in 1 or 2 civil wars(please correct this stat). Genghis on the other hand had to first unite together the Mongolian warring tribes. After uniting them together, he had to face nations who were technologically ahead of him. They even had to fight against strongly fortified cities, which the Mongolians had never seen before in their lives, let alone have the knowledge to break into them. Lastly he conquered more land on his own, and during his own time, then did any of the other conquerors. The greatest conqueror will always be up for debate, as one can never weigh the different conquerors accomplishments against each other, as each had to face different difficulties during their own time. Lastly, this is not about the greatest conquering nation, it is about who(ONE person) is the greatest conqueror. So if you wish to debate my choice, make sure you have A conqueror to represent and not a nation. ---- The Mongols were the finest horsemen in the known world, if that's not a powerful army I'm not sure what is? ---- The Mongols beat ninety city's in one year many of them walled and on the feild they had superior tactics and skill.
William the Conqueror split up the land into territories and gave a piece of land to knights that had always remained noble to him. He ordered them to control their territory and kill those that stood in the way.
For the same reason that the Spaniards always used people native to the areas they conquered: To perform the hard work needed.
Mali, Ghana, Songhai, Kush and Axum.
Hinduism had no founder so it was not founded. It has always existed.
Ya he conquered Mexico with only 800 men
William the Conqueror helped Britain in many ways such as the introduction of the Feudal system, but he also started things like the harrying of the North so he was not always good. I think it is up to you to decide, he certainly changed England though.
William the Conqueror was known to have nine children, although there are speculations of a tenth child that died. I believe he was married, although there have always been rumors of him having a "bastard child." Either way, he must have had children, because we have traced the Williamson family lineage directly back to him.
He always was the co-founder because he is Walt Disney's nephew.
They did not had mixed feeling toward Hindu. They always had a feeling of conqueror and they tried their best to destroy ancient culture of Hindu.
None. The world has always been a place of disparate cultures, and none has overcome all the others.
They did not had mixed feeling toward Hindu. They always had a feeling of conqueror and they tried their best to destroy ancient culture of Hindu.
Genghis Khan. However this is up for debate as some may consider Julius Caesar a greater conqueror, or Napoleon, or Alexander. However those other Conquerors had already a powerful army at their disposal, and were technologically equal or better than the nations/peoples they conquered. Furthermore they had their nation more or less unified, except for Caesar, who had to fight in 1 or 2 civil wars(please correct this stat). Genghis on the other hand had to first unite together the Mongolian warring tribes. After uniting them together, he had to face nations who were technologically ahead of him. They even had to fight against strongly fortified cities, which the Mongolians had never seen before in their lives, let alone have the knowledge to break into them. Lastly he conquered more land on his own, and during his own time, then did any of the other conquerors. The greatest conqueror will always be up for debate, as one can never weigh the different conquerors accomplishments against each other, as each had to face different difficulties during their own time. Lastly, this is not about the greatest conquering nation, it is about who(ONE person) is the greatest conqueror. So if you wish to debate my choice, make sure you have A conqueror to represent and not a nation. ---- The Mongols were the finest horsemen in the known world, if that's not a powerful army I'm not sure what is? ---- The Mongols beat ninety city's in one year many of them walled and on the feild they had superior tactics and skill.
Greece is always 1st at the Olympic games, because its where they were born & Greece is being honored as their founder.
William the Conqueror split up the land into territories and gave a piece of land to knights that had always remained noble to him. He ordered them to control their territory and kill those that stood in the way.