0
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
What else can I help you with?
Who defeated the slave army?
Marcus Licinius Crassus led Roman legions to defeat the slave army of Spartacus.
Did the roman army ever develop a calvary?
Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.
Who won the battle of queen boudicca?
The Roman army led by Gaius Suetonius Paulinus defeated Boudicca's forces.
Who was a roman centurion and why was he important?
A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.
Who was in te Roman army?
Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.
What wreaked the Roman army?
Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.
How was roman general scipio different from Hannibal?
As an elected magistrate, he led an army of Roman citizens. Hannibal led a mercenary army for the Carthaginians.
Who led the roman army in the third punic war?
Scipio Aemilianus.
In roman The consuls led the government and?
In Rome, in addition to leading the government, the consuls also led the army.
Who led first roman army to Britain?
Julius Caesar
Who defeated the slave army?
Marcus Licinius Crassus led Roman legions to defeat the slave army of Spartacus.
Which army finally took Corinth?
In 146 BCE the Roman army led by Lucius Mummius beseiged and captured Corinth.
How did Boadicea resist the Roman invasion?
She mobilised her tribe and others to provide a force which could challenge Roman military rulership.
Why should you join the roman army?
dude , Julius led the roman army nut head.
Who was boudccia?
Boudica (Boudicca) was a Celtic queen who led an armed revolt against the Roman army .
Who was the Roman general who helped with the Second Punic War?
Scipio Africanus led the Roman army in the final phase of the Second Punic War
Did the roman army ever develop a calvary?
Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.
