It is uncertain who or what actually caused the fire - whether accident or arson. According to Tacitus, some in the population held Nero responsible. To diffuse blame, Nero targeted the Christians. There were Christians who confessed to the crime, but it became known that Christians were forced to confess by means of torture, and the passage is unclear as to what the Christians confessed to - being arsonists or Christians. Suetonius and Cassius Dio favor Nero as the arsonist with an insane desire to destroy the city as his motive, or to rebuild Rome in a new style more to his liking. However, major accidental fires were common in ancient Rome. In fact, Rome burned again under Vitellius in 69 and under Titus in 80.
The Great Fire of London in 1666.
It is believed that Thomas Farrinor started the great fire of London. It is said that he had left some bread on the windowsill to cool when he saw a young thief try to steal the bread. He turned suddenly, causing hot coals to spill on to the dry wooden floor. The floor caught fire, and as all the houses were wooden and close together, a fire could spread quickly and easily.
No
The Chicago Fire started on October 8, 1871.
The origin of the Great Chicago Fire of 1871 remains unknown.
There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.There was never a Roman emperor that started a fire that destroyed half of the city.
yes
The Great Fire of London in 1666.
The Great Fire of London started on 2nd September 1666 in a baker's shop in Pudding Lane. There is no evidence that the fire was started deliberately although various groups were blamed at the time.
Mrs. O'Leary owned the cow near where the fire started. There was no proof that the cow started the fire.
It is believed that Thomas Farrinor started the great fire of London. It is said that he had left some bread on the windowsill to cool when he saw a young thief try to steal the bread. He turned suddenly, causing hot coals to spill on to the dry wooden floor. The floor caught fire, and as all the houses were wooden and close together, a fire could spread quickly and easily.
The Romans were involved in a great many wars.
Roman Catholics
Yes and it was started by a baker.
No
negligence at a bakery.
The Great Fire of London (1666) started on Pudding Lane and subsequently ended at Pye Corner -coincidence? -I think not!