The case was initially filed in the County Court of Baltimore, Maryland.Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
In McCulloch v. Maryland, James McCulloch's rights were violated when the state of Maryland imposed a tax on the Second Bank of the United States, which he managed. This tax was seen as an attempt to undermine federal authority and interfere with the operations of a federal institution. McCulloch argued that the state could not tax the national bank, as it would violate the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, which establishes that federal law takes precedence over state law. Ultimately, the Supreme Court upheld McCulloch's position, reinforcing the principle of federal supremacy.
The case of McCulloch v. Maryland was over an issue of states' rights vs the rights of government. The state of Maryland wanted to tax the federal bank because they believed it was unconstitutional. However, the verdict of the case imposed the "necessary and proper" clause which gave the federal government power to make laws which weren't specified in the Constitution, but generally thought of as needed and lawful.
Congress passed an act in 1816 to start the Second Bank of the United States to help control currency in the nation. The Bank opened a branch in Maryland to issue bank notes, carry out transactions, etc. In 1818, Maryland passed an act to tax the Bank. James McCulloch, head of the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank, refused to pay the tax that Maryland had imposed.Maryland filed a lawsuit in court against McCulloch in an attempt to collect the tax. Maryland stated that the Constitution did not allow the federal government to charter a bank, so the Bank was unconstitutional. When the case reached the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Marshall declared that the Bank was constitutional because of the elastic clause and Congress's implied powers. According to the Supreme Court, Congress had the authority to make any law necessary and proper for carrying out its duties, including the right to charter a national bank.In the end, the Supreme Court decided that the federal government had the power to set up a national bank and the states did not have the power to tax the federal government. Marshall's reason was that the power to tax involves the power to destroy. The Mcculloch v. Maryland case was fundamental in establishing (1) the principle of Congress's implied powers and (2) federal government's precedence over state governments.Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
The decision in McCulloch v Maryland, (1819) increased federalism by invoking "implied powers" and established a hierarchical dominance of the central government over the states. This created a precedent that could be used to decide other cases in which federal and state interests conflicted.ExplanationMarshall concluded that Congress had the right to establish a national bank as an implied power under the Necessary and Proper Clause because the bank was being used to further Congress' constitutional authority to tax and distribute funds. Unlike the Articles of Confederation, which preceded the US Constitution, the Constitution does not prohibit the exercise of implied powers necessary to assist in carrying out constitutional mandates.The Court also held that the Supremacy clause, which elevates federal law above state law when the two are in conflict (and do not involve a right reserved to the state) protected the bank from being taxed by the State(s).Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
James McCulloch was cashier and head of the Baltimore, Maryland, branch of The Second Bank of the United States who refused to pay a new tax the State of Maryland attempted to impose on the bank. McCulloch was the nominal defendant in Maryland's case against the federal government in the state courts, and the petitioner in the US Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland, (1819).Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)For more information about McCulloch v. Maryland, see Related Links, below.
McCulloch v. Maryland prevented states from taxing the federal government. The state of Maryland was trying to impose a tax on all bank notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. At the time, the only bank of this sort in Maryland was the Second Bank of the United States.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
McCulloch v. Maryland settled that the National Bank was constitutional. Also it settled that Maryland does not have the power to tax a institution created by congress.
black people
vs. MARYLAND
McCulloch v. Maryland.An example of national supremacy clause can be seen in the case McCulloch v. Maryland.
Jake Henderson was here :)
How did the Supreme Court’s ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland strengthen the federal government ?The court case known as McCulloch v. Maryland of March 6, 1819, was a seminal Supreme Court Case that affirmed the right of implied powers, that there were powers that the federal government had that were not specifically mentioned in the Constitution, but were implied by it.
McCulloch v. Maryland
McCulloch vs Maryland
true