During the republic, there was no commander-in-chief of the Roman armies. They took their orders from their general or legate, who in turn took his orders from the senate. At times the senate would authorize an individual to take a number of legions into a trouble spot. In cases like this the senate authorized man would be in overall command of the legions under him. During the principate, however, all legions were commanded by the emperor, who became the commandeer-in-chief, delegating authority.
There were several dominant Roman armies in history. These Roman armies include the Romany Army of the Mid-Repubic, Imperial Roman Army, Middle Byzantine Army, and Komnenian Byzantine Army.
No.
In encampments, like all armies.
Msada was held and defended by the sicarii.
Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.
There were several dominant Roman armies in history. These Roman armies include the Romany Army of the Mid-Repubic, Imperial Roman Army, Middle Byzantine Army, and Komnenian Byzantine Army.
Greek & Roman armies :D
NO
lots of things
No.
the annals of the roman armies were amazing
In encampments, like all armies.
Msada was held and defended by the sicarii.
The people who commanded the armies and ran the legal system were called Praetors. They were appointed by the Roman government.
Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.
Roman Empire says it all. They had money, numbers, armies, technology.
When the Roman armies were defeated, the barbarians overran and sacked Rome.