There were no emperors in 382BC. In 382CE(AD) the emperor was Theodosius II on his death in 395 the empire was divided between his sons Arcadius (East) and Honorius (West). The two halves were never to be reunited after this date but this was not necessarily the original intention.
If you are referring to the Roman empire, no one split it into two pieces or two parts. The emperor Diocletian divided it into four parts which was called the tetrarchy. It was later historians that gave the false impression that the empire was split.
It was the historians of the Middle Ages that first began using the terms eastern and western for parts of the Roman empire. This was not meant to give a false impression, but to clarify their positions and their theories on Roman life.
The Eastern Roman Empire and the Western Roman Empire.
The Western Roman Empire and the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire.
The emperor Diocletian was the one who divided the empire into four parts in order to make it easier to govern.
There were no emperors in 382BC. In 382CE(AD) the emperor was Theodosius II on his death in 395 the empire was divided between his sons Arcadius (East) and Honorius (West). The two halves were never to be reunited after this date but this was not necessarily the original intention.
He never did. Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, that's why it was/is called the tetrarchy. He did his cut job thinking that it would be easier to rule and to commuicate.
If you are referring to the Roman Empire, no one split it into two pieces or two parts. The emperor Diocletian divided it into four parts which was called the tetrarchy. It was later historians that gave the false impression that the empire was split.
If you are referring to the Roman empire, no one split it into two pieces or two parts. The emperor Diocletian divided it into four parts which was called the tetrarchy. It was later historians that gave the false impression that the empire was split.
No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.
It was the historians of the Middle Ages that first began using the terms eastern and western for parts of the Roman empire. This was not meant to give a false impression, but to clarify their positions and their theories on Roman life.
The Eastern Roman Empire and the Western Roman Empire.
Emperor Diocletian, who created a tetrarchy to more effectively govern the Roman world. It consisted of two senior emperors (augustii) and two junior emperors (caesars), with the western capital based in Rome and the eastern capital in what would be Constantinople.
The Roman Empire was divided into eastern and western Rome
The Empire had become too large to control in a pre-mechanical transport and pre-electronic communications age. He split it into four parts, the two larger - east and west - ruled by their own emperor, the two lesser ones by a caesar. This gave each ruler a manageable area to control.
The Western Roman Empire and the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire.