answersLogoWhite

0

The "timid souls" in the Great Society referred to individuals, often within the political sphere, who were hesitant to fully embrace the ambitious reforms proposed by President Lyndon B. Johnson in the 1960s. These individuals often prioritized caution and incremental change over sweeping social and economic reforms aimed at eradicating poverty and promoting civil rights. Their importance lay in their influence on the pace and scope of legislation, as their concerns about potential backlash and feasibility shaped the implementation of Great Society programs. Ultimately, their reservations highlighted the tensions between bold vision and pragmatic governance during a transformative era in American history.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2w ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What were Clara Barton's strengths and weaknesses?

She was shy and timid.


What does the surname Rea mean?

Anciently, the Strathclyde-Britons of the Scottish/English Borderlands developed this nickname-type surname to denote a shy or timid person. It is first recorded in Dumfriesshire. Family motto: "Ready for everything!"


Who is Ernst Kretschmer?

He was a German psychiatrist who thought that people's personalities were dependent on their body types. He grouped people into three categories: thin, athletic (which was later added to the skinny category), and stocky. He thought that skinny people were introverted and timid while stocky people were friendly and open. The idea of relating body types to personality is no longer used today. See http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/899667


What does the surname Meeks mean?

Family motto: "I am joined that I may become full!" The proud and noble Scottish nickname-type surname of Meeks began it's historic rise through the withering sands of time from rather austere beginnings in Fife, where they had held a family seat. The ancient Picts would have originally bestowed this surname upon a person or persons with timid, humble, or merciful attributes.


Were the allies weak during World War 2?

USAStrategic: - Unskilled and timid generals- poor over all strategy (straight ahead mass attack) - decision to limit army size to 60 divisions (The other combatants had total mobilization with 100's of divisions) - isolationist stance led to being late out of the gate with design and training (tanks, planes) - incorrect armored strategy (tank destroyer concept) - Pacific strategy dissipated strength (two paths of attack) - unskilled troops at all levels - replacement concept Tactical: Poor tanks (armament and armor) - poor airplanes (initially) - tank destroyers - defective torpedoes - lack of light MG - poor anti-tank weaponsUSSRStrategic: - Unskilled generals, timid - officer corps decimated by purges - political operatives co-leading military units - poor overall strategy (straight ahead mass attack) - disregard for lifeTactical: poor airplanes (initially) - poor low level leadership (initially) - poor troop training - disregard for troop welfare - shortage of arms (initially) - uneducated troopsUKStrategic: Extremely timid generals(early in war) - class bound officer corps - small army(early in war) - Small airforce (early in war)- Last war thinking(early in war) - Forces spread out all over the globe - dependence on imports along extended supply lines, Tactical: poor tanks(early in war)AnswerNot at all, they were strong enough to win. AnswerI agree with the last answer. The Allied Forces had a substantial role in defeating Hitler and the German Empire, along with the other countries like the Red Army. The French army was much larger than the Germans and they had some very good tanks. There tactics were the pitts and they got there butts kicked.The Russian army was the largest in the wotld