0
What else can I help you with?
What did Samuel Adams and Otis agree on?
Samuel Adams and James Otis both agreed on the importance of opposing British taxation and asserting colonial rights. They believed that the Stamp Act and other forms of taxation without representation were unjust and violated the rights of the colonists. Both men were instrumental in mobilizing public sentiment against British rule and advocating for colonial resistance, setting the stage for the American Revolution. Their collaboration helped to unite colonists in their fight for independence.
Who were the stakeholders of the Boston tea party?
There were two audiences, actually. The immediate audience was the angry colonists who were present on December 16, 1773 when the event occurred, as well as those who watched or soon heard about this protest against unfair British taxation of tea. But the other audience was the King of England-- he wasn't there, although his soldiers were, but the colonists were sending him a message. They believed British rule had become too onerous and unjust, and they were ready to take action.
Mohandas gandhi protested british laws by?
using methods of civil disobedience, that is, refusing to obey laws considered to be unjust. =)
What did the British do to cause the Boston massacre?
The British caused it by being in Boston. Red Coats get relatively no pay so they competed for jobs with the Bostonians. That, and the stress of taxes (Sugar and Stamp Acts) caused a lot of hostilities towards the British. A mob started throwing things at guards outside the custom house. Major Pitcairn tried to keep his troops from firing back, but they did anyway. When one person fired, others followed. It's important to remember that the British directly involved did nothing but compete for jobs. They were under attack from ice balls, stones, anything the mob could throw, they did. Paul Revere's picture where the Bostonians looked completely innocent was not what really happened. It was propaganda to antagonize Britain.
Does Procopius Buildings suggest that Justinian is a just or unjust ruler?
Unjust
What did Martin Luther King Jr's letters from a Birmingham jail argue?
people should resist unfair laws (apex)
What was Arthur Iredell's reaction to the event of the boycotting tea?
Arthur Iredell, a North Carolina judge and politician, supported the boycott of British tea in protest of the Tea Act imposed by the British government. He believed in the rights of the colonies to resist unjust taxation and showed solidarity with the cause of the American colonists in opposing British policies.
Who was the critical thinker and American philosopher who advocated civil disobedience when laws are unjust?
Henry David Thoreau was the critical thinker and American philosopher who advocated civil disobedience when laws are unjust. His essay "Civil Disobedience" inspired many future activists and leaders to peacefully resist unjust government actions.
What did Martin Luther King Jr.'s Letter from a Birmingham Jail argue?
People should resist unfair laws.people should disobey unjust laws.
At the end of Resistance to Civil Government what does Henry David Thoreau conclude about the government?
That it has not done enough to truly represent the people
What does Henry David Thoreau believe people should do when they think a law is unfair?
Ignore it and distance themselves from the government
What did Samuel Adams and Otis agree on?
Samuel Adams and James Otis both agreed on the importance of opposing British taxation and asserting colonial rights. They believed that the Stamp Act and other forms of taxation without representation were unjust and violated the rights of the colonists. Both men were instrumental in mobilizing public sentiment against British rule and advocating for colonial resistance, setting the stage for the American Revolution. Their collaboration helped to unite colonists in their fight for independence.
What did Martin Luther king Jr letter from Birmingham jail argue?
people should disobey unjust laws~apex
Why did Britain pass new laws that the colonists referred to as the intolorable acts?
Britain passed the Intolerable Acts in response to the Boston Tea Party as punishment for the colonists' protests against British colonial rule. The acts were intended to assert British authority over the colonies and quell dissent, leading the colonists to view them as harsh and unjust.
The idea of not following any law or rule that is considered unjust is called?
It is called Resistance or Disobedience. (Civil disobedience). . An individual in a society must obey just laws. Disobey and resist unjust laws....However,there are ways within the legal system through which the problems can be solved peacefully.
Who were the stakeholders of the Boston tea party?
There were two audiences, actually. The immediate audience was the angry colonists who were present on December 16, 1773 when the event occurred, as well as those who watched or soon heard about this protest against unfair British taxation of tea. But the other audience was the King of England-- he wasn't there, although his soldiers were, but the colonists were sending him a message. They believed British rule had become too onerous and unjust, and they were ready to take action.
Mohandas gandhi protested british laws by?
using methods of civil disobedience, that is, refusing to obey laws considered to be unjust. =)
